Teched Australia 2006 Recap - Business Process and Integration Landscape
I thought I’d take some time to capture some of my thoughts for each of the sessions I was lucky enough to be involved in this year.
This was my third session at Teched and was very fortunate to have Paul Woods from Data#3 and Steve Maw from Formfill with me on this session. My main objective for this session was really to get Paul and Steve an opportunity to present how they used BizTalk in context of;
(a) How a partner has built a process centric BizTalk solution for their client
(b) How an ISV has used BizTalk as an enabling technology for their market leading application called FlowTalk.
Each of these solutions use BizTalk to manage highly complex business process scenarios. It’s not about core messaging, that’s a means to an end. Where you start getting real success is modelling processes and providing visibility layers on top of those processes.
This was a great session, and although it was a level 100 session was very well received. There were plenty of questions and feedback afterwards so thanks to everyone who attended. There was about 50 of you present, but we only received 4 official evaluations. If you have any other feedback, please let me know! Many after the session commented on how they got perspectives on how not only BizTalk was being used to solve requirements but the MS stack working together.
The overall scores were;
Question |
Avg |
Overall satisfaction with the session |
8.00 |
Usefulness of the information presented |
7.75 |
Presenter's knowledge of the subject |
7.75 |
Presenter's presentation skills |
7.75 |
Effectiveness of the presentation |
8.00 |
Room setup, audio visual and logistics |
7.75 |
Overall Results
Evals Submitted |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q5 |
Q9 |
QAvg |
4 |
8.00 |
7.75 |
7.75 |
7.75 |
8.00 |
7.75 |
7.85 |
Thanks again to Paul and Steve and thank you all for your time at Teched this year! See you throughout the year, and thats me signing out for my feedback of my three sessions. Please do let me know if there is anything we can do to improve your experiences!
Comments
Anonymous
August 27, 2006
The comment has been removedAnonymous
August 27, 2006
Hey Me... Thanks!
Good point. I don't know why the Teched organisers decided not to do that this year i.e. put paper evals on each seat. I'll ping them an email to determine the rationale. Hey another quick question, do you think it would have made a difference if we had an incentive for doing the evals? In the US, they gave away an XBOX 360. Does that make any difference?Anonymous
May 29, 2009
PingBack from http://paidsurveyshub.info/story.php?title=chris-vidotto-s-blog-teched-australia-2006-recap-business-processAnonymous
May 31, 2009
PingBack from http://patiochairsite.info/story.php?id=1400Anonymous
June 01, 2009
PingBack from http://portablegreenhousesite.info/story.php?id=13415Anonymous
June 02, 2009
PingBack from http://patiochairsite.info/story.php?id=14568Anonymous
June 13, 2009
PingBack from http://gardendecordesign.info/story.php?id=4105Anonymous
June 15, 2009
PingBack from http://unemploymentofficeresource.info/story.php?id=968Anonymous
June 16, 2009
PingBack from http://workfromhomecareer.info/story.php?id=8723Anonymous
June 17, 2009
PingBack from http://patioumbrellasource.info/story.php?id=815