Partager via

6.1.7600.16385

  • Article

 

‘nuf said.

Comments

  • Anonymous
    July 22, 2009
    So did you win Last Check-In Chicken for this release?

  • Anonymous
    July 22, 2009
    Nope.  I actually don't know which teams ended up being the final checkins.

  • Anonymous
    July 22, 2009
    what about the compiled date? is it July 13th?

  • Anonymous
    July 22, 2009
    Best. Windows. Ever. (I contributed!)

  • Anonymous
    July 22, 2009
    Sources suggest it is the 13th.

  • Anonymous
    July 22, 2009
    Congratulations to you, Larry and to other Microsofties! Out of curiosity - do you happen to know, how much time it takes to make a full build of Windows 7 code?

  • Anonymous
    July 23, 2009
    Yay. o/ Looking forward to installing this for real, after only really dabbling with Win7 in VMs and a test machine (that I never really use) until now.

  • Anonymous
    July 23, 2009
    Maciej: Funny you should ask that: http://edge.technet.com/Media/Building-Win7-interview-with-a-Build-Engineer/ Shorter video: About 12 hours according to Istvan.

  • Anonymous
    July 23, 2009
    Stupid question, but why is the product being called Windows 7 when it's really a 6th-generation Windows build?  I was expecting the official title to change (as when Longhorn became Vista).

  • Anonymous
    July 23, 2009
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    July 23, 2009
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    July 23, 2009
    Shame you missed out on the magic 16KB version... ;)

  • Anonymous
    July 23, 2009
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    July 24, 2009
    Amazing work across the board, but since I've been reading your blog I pay increasing attention to audio and while Vista was light-years ahead of XP in terms of audio control, Win7 is a massive improvement over Vista. Congratulations to you and the rest of your team.

  • Anonymous
    July 26, 2009
    Larry, can you confirm that the RTM release of windows 7 (6.1.7600.16385), was compiled on the 13th July? Thanks!

  • Anonymous
    July 27, 2009
    @Ooh: Uh, 16384 is not 2^7; it's 2^14.

  • Anonymous
    July 28, 2009
    Thanks Larry, looking forward to Windows 7. I do like the audio feature (on Vista) that gives me a volume control for each application. Brian

  • Anonymous
    July 31, 2009
    > I do like the audio feature (on Vista) that gives me a volume control for each application. In Windows 7, the per-app volume controls have volume meters now (like the device volume controls have in Vista.)