Partager via

Microsoft Point of Service for .NET v1.12

  • Article

Microsoft Point of Service for .NET v1.12 has now been released and is available for immediate download at the Microsoft downloads site.

POS for .NET v1.12 has been updated to be fully compliant with the latest release of the Unified POS specification. New devices that have been added includes:

· Belt

· Electronic Value RW

· Gate

· Item Dispenser

· Lights

· RFID Scanner

In addition the there is now support for encrypted MSR devices as well as some updates to the FiscalPrinter.

 - Sylvester

Comments

  • Anonymous
    March 24, 2008
    Anybody happen to know of this version of POS will work with ClickOnce? I know that there are a bunch of people for whom ClickOnce compatibility would be a great benefit. Thanks :)

  • Anonymous
    April 03, 2008
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    April 06, 2008
    If you are building point of service systems, and you haven't noticed: we quietly released version 1.12

  • Anonymous
    April 07, 2008
    If you are building point of service systems, and you haven't noticed: we quietly released version

  • Anonymous
    May 22, 2008
    hi, i have tried the following method inmy POS application but its returning "NULL" value. can you help me out what is going wrong?

static string GetDeviceDisplayName(DeviceInfo device) {    string name = CombineNames( device.LogicalNames );    if (name.Length == 0)    {        name = device.ServiceObjectName;        if (name.Length == 0)            name = device.Description;    }    return name; }

Regards Ravi mcamail2002@gmail.com

  • Anonymous
    June 09, 2008
    Thanks for the post about ClickOnce. The GAC issue is what I and others (from my headbanging posts on other forums a while back) were hoping would be resolved in some manner to allow POS for .Net apps to be distributed with ClickOnce. Would you happen to know if the ClickOnce team is planning on adding a security level to permit access to the GAC or if the POS for .Net team is working on a alternate installation method? Many thanks

  • Anonymous
    June 10, 2008
    The comment has been removed