다음을 통해 공유


WinVerifyTrust update will be mandatory for WSUS

Good morning folks,

 

A couple of weeks ago, I posted about Windows Vista Service Pack 1’s availability to WSUS. In that post, we mentioned that you should install the WinVerifyTrust update (KB 938759) if you are running your WSUS server on a Windows 2003 server to prevent Windows Vista SP1 from being continually re-downloaded to the server once the service pack is released to WSUS.

Today, we’d like to let you know that, in order to make sure all customers are well protected, we will be marking this particular update as mandatory, which means it will appear in the Updates/WSUS Updates node of the Admin console, and will be auto-approved by default (since the “Advanced/WSUS Updates” checkbox is checked by default in Options/Automatic Approvals).

After this update has been marked as mandatory to WSUS for a short period of time, we will release Windows Vista Service Pack 1 to WSUS. We believe that this change will help make sure all customers have a good experience once SP1 is released to WSUS, and will also ensure that WSUS can be used to deploy other large updates we may release in the future.

 

Thank you for your support.

 

Cecilia Cole

WSUS Program Manager

Comments

  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2003
    Vista sp1 on WSUS Ready or not..here comes Vista sp1 hitting our WSUS boxes today...YOU SHOULD HAVE the

  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2003
    If you are running Update Services in SBS 2003 R2 or just WSUS on any versions of SBS 2003, the WinVerifyTrust

  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2003
    Brilliant article, the batch file resolved this annoying issue, thank you a lot!

  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2003
    132 Microsoft Team blogs searched, 105 blogs have new articles in the past 30 days. 641 new articles

  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2003
    Over on the WSUS Product Team blog Cecilia Cole just posted about how the WinVerifyTrust update will

  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2003
    Kudos, good idea.  I could just see the wsus newsgroup filling up already had you not done this ;)

  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2003
    132 Microsoft Team blogs searched, 105 blogs have new articles in the past 30 days. 641 new articles

  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2003
    In case you don't read the WSUS Team Blog (you should by the way), there is a rather ominous posting

  • Anonymous
    June 19, 2008
    Is this updated forced out to ALL instances of WSUS3 regardless of what updates they sync up with? If my WSUS3 doesn't actually have any Vista clients connecting to it so those updates aren't being synced will this update still be forced out to me?

  • Anonymous
    July 07, 2008
    July 7th and still no Vista SP1 on my WSUS... is that correct or something's wrong here?

  • Anonymous
    July 07, 2008
    Ditto on the no vista sp1 on my wsus server as well...team here is becoming irritated and threatening to use a custom package via sccm - but I would prefer to use wsus!

  • Anonymous
    August 13, 2008
    rsr Een plaatje zegt alles, toch ? sys  Het volledige rapport is hier te vinden. Lees natuurlijk i  de blogposting. y e Thanks for interesting post! lfy [url=http://skuper.ru]ламинат и паркет[/url] 0w

  • Anonymous
    August 18, 2008
    1qThank's.6m I compleatly disagree with last post . <a href="http://all-siding.ru/index.php?section_id=129">обшивка сайдингом</a> 7i <a href="http://all-siding.ru/index.php?section_id=74">металлический сайдинг</a> 6c

  • Anonymous
    October 18, 2008
    If my WSUS3 doesn't actually have any Vista clients connecting to it so those updates aren't being synced will this update still be forced out to me?

  • Anonymous
    October 20, 2008
    WSUS... is that correct or something's wrong here?

  • Anonymous
    October 20, 2008
    being synced will this update still be forced out to me?

  • Anonymous
    October 20, 2008
    If my WSUS3 doesn't actually have any Vista clients connecting to it so those updates aren't being synced will this update still be forced out to me?

  • Anonymous
    October 20, 2008
    actually have any Vista clients connecting to it so those updates aren't being synced will this update still be forced

  • Anonymous
    November 12, 2008
    WSUS server on a Windows 2003 server to prevents Windows Vista SP1 from being continually re-downloaded to the server once the service packs is released to WSUS thanks

  • Anonymous
    November 12, 2008
    After this updates has been marked as mandatorys to WSUS for a shorts thanks

  • Anonymous
    November 12, 2008
    Windows Vista Service Packs 1 to WSUS very good web page thanks

  • Anonymous
    November 12, 2008
    becoming irritateds and threatenings to use a customs packages via sccm very good

  • Anonymous
    November 12, 2008
    Admin console, and will be auto-approveds by defaults (since the “Advanced/WSUS Update” checkbox is checkeds thanks very nice

  • Anonymous
    December 08, 2008
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    December 11, 2008
    http://www.battery-export.com/hp/hp-pavilion-dv9000-series.html  HP Pavilion DV9000 SERIES   http://www.battery-export.com/hp/hp-pavilion-dv9100-series.html  HP Pavilion dv9100 Series   http://www.battery-export.com/hp/hp-pavilion-dv9200-series.html  HP Pavilion dv9200 Series

  • Anonymous
    January 01, 2009
    thnaks <a href="http://www.trstar.net" title="chat sohbet, sohbet odalari">sohbet chat</a> sites no spam :D

  • Anonymous
    February 15, 2009
    132 Microsoft Team blogs searched, 105 blogs have new articles in the past 30 days. 641 new articles

  • Anonymous
    February 15, 2009
    Admin console, and will be auto-approveds by defaults (since the “Advanced/WSUS Update” checkbox is checkeds thanks very nice

  • Anonymous
    July 23, 2009
    becoming irritateds and threatenings to use a customs packages via sccm very good

  • Anonymous
    November 17, 2009
    becoming irritateds and threatenings to use a customs packages via sccm very good

  • Anonymous
    February 19, 2010
    becoming irritateds and threatenings to use a customs packages via sccm very good

  • Anonymous
    April 10, 2011
    I am following your site for a long time.We have visitors, write effective articles.Thank you all for your effort. My English is not very good grammar errors may occur. http://tatilyerlerix.com