Rediger

Del via

CA1836: Prefer IsEmpty over Count when available

  • Artikkel
Property Value
Rule ID CA1836
Title Prefer IsEmpty over Count when available
Category Performance
Fix is breaking or non-breaking Non-breaking
Enabled by default in .NET 9 As suggestion

Cause

The Count or Length property or the Count<TSource>(IEnumerable<TSource>) extension method was used to determine whether or not the object contains any items by comparing the value to 0 or 1, and the object has a more efficient IsEmpty property that could be used instead.

Rule description

This rule flags the calls to the Count and Length properties or Count<TSource>(IEnumerable<TSource>) and LongCount<TSource>(IEnumerable<TSource>) LINQ methods when they are used to determine if the object contains any items and the object has a more efficient IsEmpty property.

The analysis of this rule originally overlapped with similar rules CA1827, CA1828, and CA1829; the analyzers of such rules were merged along with the one for CA1836 to report the best diagnosis in case of overlap.

How to fix violations

To fix a violation, replace the Count<TSource>(IEnumerable<TSource>) or LongCount<TSource>(IEnumerable<TSource>) method call or the Length or Count property access when it's used in an operation that determines if the object is empty with use of the IsEmpty property access. For example, the following two code snippets show a violation of the rule and how to fix it:

using System.Collections.Concurrent;

class C
{
    ConcurrentQueue<int> _queue;
    public bool IsEmpty => _queue.Count == 0;
}

using System.Collections.Concurrent;

class C
{
    ConcurrentQueue<int> _queue;
    public bool IsEmpty => _queue.IsEmpty;
}

Tip

A code fix is available for this rule in Visual Studio. To use it, position the cursor on the violation and press Ctrl+. (period). Choose Prefer 'IsEmpty' over 'Count' to determine whether the object contains or not any items from the list of options that's presented.

Code fix for CA1836 - Prefer 'IsEmpty' over 'Count' to determine whether the object contains or not any items

When to suppress warnings

It's safe to suppress a violation of this rule if you're not concerned about the performance impact from unnecessary item enumeration to compute the count.

Suppress a warning

If you just want to suppress a single violation, add preprocessor directives to your source file to disable and then re-enable the rule.

#pragma warning disable CA1836
// The code that's violating the rule is on this line.
#pragma warning restore CA1836

To disable the rule for a file, folder, or project, set its severity to none in the configuration file.

[*.{cs,vb}]
dotnet_diagnostic.CA1836.severity = none

For more information, see How to suppress code analysis warnings.

See also