How to: Combine Parallel and Sequential LINQ Queries
Updated: May 2010
This example shows how to use the AsSequential<TSource> method to instruct PLINQ to process all subsequent operators in the query sequentially. Although sequential processing is generally slower than parallel, sometimes it is necessary to produce correct results.
Caution |
---|
This example is intended to demonstrate usage, and might not run faster than the equivalent sequential LINQ to Objects query. For more information about speedup, see Understanding Speedup in PLINQ. |
Example
The following example shows one scenario in which AsSequential<TSource> is required, namely to preserve the ordering that was established in a previous clause of the query.
' Paste into PLINQDataSample class
Shared Sub SequentialDemo()
Dim orders = GetOrders()
Dim query = From ord In orders.AsParallel()
Order By ord.CustomerID
Select New With
{
ord.OrderID,
ord.OrderDate,
ord.ShippedDate
}
Dim query2 = query.AsSequential().Take(5)
For Each item In query2
Console.WriteLine("{0}, {1}, {2}", item.OrderDate, item.OrderID, item.ShippedDate)
Next
End Sub
// Paste into PLINQDataSample class.
static void SequentialDemo()
{
var orders = GetOrders();
var query = (from ord in orders.AsParallel()
orderby ord.CustomerID
select new
{
Details = ord.OrderID,
Date = ord.OrderDate,
Shipped = ord.ShippedDate
}).
AsSequential().Take(5);
}
Compiling the Code
To compile and run this code, paste it into the PLINQ Data Sample project, add a line to call the method from Main, and press F5.
See Also
Concepts
Change History
Date |
History |
Reason |
---|---|---|
May 2010 |
Added note concerning usage vs. speedup. |
Customer feedback. |