Any other .NET 3.5 SP1 issues?
So I recently posted Known issues for ASP.NET with .NET 3.5 SP1, what I wanted to do is see how SP1 was working out for everyone so far. The things I am wondering are:
- Did you have any problems installing SP1
- Have any existing applications run into any problems
- Have any new projects been adjusted because of SP1
- What are your overall impressions of SP1
If you have any other thoughts, I’d like to hear them too. I’m hoping there aren’t many problems and that it is proving useful to everyone.
Comments
Anonymous
September 02, 2008
PingBack from http://informationsfunnywallpaper.cn/?p=3542Anonymous
September 02, 2008
The Binary Formatter hangs when deserializing certain classes. For me it's a major issue, because older versions of the software I programmed don't work anymore https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=356498Anonymous
September 03, 2008
The comment has been removedAnonymous
September 03, 2008
- App_Browsers/default.browser issues when Frontpage _vti_bin folders exist.
- Couple of older 3rd party applications didn't handle the upgrade well.
- The install went flawless using a SMS package.
Anonymous
September 03, 2008
The comment has been removedAnonymous
September 03, 2008
hi, I've a problem with your website. with IE and debug ON, every time I press a key I receive a debug error. So I cannot write anything in forms or navigate with arrowkeys and so on. can you check it? thanks LennyAnonymous
September 03, 2008
- Install went fine, though for my machine, it got installed went I went to install SQL Server 2008 from the demo ISO on launch day, so its probably not the typical experience (3.5 SP1 wasn't even officially out...so it was quite the surprise!) 2)All my applications run fine, though I've heard of some people who had issues with SQL Server Management Studio 2005 (but 2008 ran fine), most of which were fixed with a repair install. There's also a list of bugs for obscure scenarios that have hit certain sites like infoq... Not gonna affect standard apps, and didn't affect my own. 3)Nope, all is peachy. 4)Impression is that SP1 could have been .NET 4.0 :) There's so much... though it seems a bit like you guys went out with more than you can chew... lots of new stuff, but many of it doesn't seem like its quite complete (for example, the Dynamic Data for Entities template doesn't work with many tables of Adventure Works 2005... one would expect at LEAST the demo database to work, since its the first thing many of us will try :)). I know there's a lot of plans for .NET 4.0, but personally, I think its time for Microsoft to have a feature-less release. Just improve and complete whats already there, overhaul some things you didn't touch in a while (like integrating nullable more), break some backward compatibility with a good tool to analyse and help upgrade application... its time now. .NET used not to have all the features to be taken seriously by heavy enterprise scenarios, but now it does. So stop adding, and just take one release to fix and improve. Of course, I know it won't happen, but I can be wishful, eh?
Anonymous
September 03, 2008
There're problems about App_Browsers JIT compiling. Read here: http://forums.asp.net/t/1189100.aspx or: http://forums.asp.net/t/1307142.aspx Even if I delete vti* folder in App_Browsers the FPSE recreates it. I opened this feedback but they closed it. http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=363176 Thie behaviour started by installing .NET 3.5 SP1 on two different 2003 + IIS6 web servers. ThanksAnonymous
September 03, 2008
The comment has been removedAnonymous
September 03, 2008
JeroenH, Do you have anything else on that? Can you give me the callstacks or anything?Anonymous
September 03, 2008
Lenny76, What is the error you get? What browser are you using?Anonymous
September 03, 2008
Steve, What does it install at the end?Anonymous
September 03, 2008
After installing SP1, I have not been able to add new controls to the toolbox. Each time I try to open the 'Choose Toolbox Item' dialog I receive the Visual Studio has encountered a problem and needs to close.Anonymous
September 03, 2008
I have vista and IE7 VS2008 debug stops here ( see arrow) var itk_analytics_event = { destination: "", cmmdKey: false, key_down: function(e){ if (!e) var e = window.event if (itk_browser.OS == "Mac" && e.keyCode == 224) itk_analytics_event.cmmdKey = true; -----> console.log(e.keyCode) }, key_up: function(e){ if (!e) var e = window.event if (itk_browser.OS == "Mac" && e.keyCode == 224) itk_analytics_event.cmmdKey = false; console.log(itk_analytics_event.cmmdKey) },Anonymous
September 03, 2008
I installed SP1 on two Server 2003 machines and the install prohibited .NET 2.0 in IIS both times.Anonymous
September 03, 2008
Ephraim Shurpin, I tried doing that myself and it works fine for me. Sounds like something didn't get installed completely correct. You may need to try to contact Microsoft support to see what isn't installed right.Anonymous
September 03, 2008
The comment has been removedAnonymous
September 03, 2008
The comment has been removedAnonymous
September 03, 2008
Thanks Eric, And glad the reboot fixed your problem. I'll keep my eye on that to see if I see more issues around that.Anonymous
September 03, 2008
The comment has been removedAnonymous
September 03, 2008
Like Jeroenh , One of my coleague also get same System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt. It occurs on different applications, and with different call stacks, but not easy/consistently reproducible (and only on that specific machine). Exact things ahppened to him as of JeroenhAnonymous
September 03, 2008
My coleague has faced Exact error as of JeroenH,Anonymous
September 03, 2008
The comment has been removedAnonymous
September 03, 2008
The comment has been removedAnonymous
September 04, 2008
The only problem I have seen, which may not be 3.5 sp1 related, is that visual web developer some times forgets to delete the app_offline.htm after building. I never had that problem before the sp1 update, but maybe it it just the web app I have been making.Anonymous
September 04, 2008
Ephraim Shurpin, Another thing you can do is try to reset the toolbox back to the default and then try adding things again. My guess is that it is some custom toolbox item.Anonymous
September 04, 2008
Niklas, It would be cool to get to see what that crash was. Do you know how to attach a debugger to the process and get a dump?Anonymous
September 04, 2008
JeroenH or anyone getting the AccessViolationException, I'd really like to get to see this error. Would it be possible for someone to capture a dump of this exception that I can take a look at? I can supply a location to upload the dump to.Anonymous
September 04, 2008
The comment has been removedAnonymous
September 04, 2008
Tom, I obviously should have got a dump from it before I unistalled it all. I can't say I have time to go through the install / reinstall process again at the moment but I can't be the only one with this problem so I'm sure you'll get your dump eventually.Anonymous
September 05, 2008
patrickG, Thanks for the additional information. That is very useful to know and hope it will help others if they run into that problem.Anonymous
September 05, 2008
Niklas, I understand.. thanks for reporting it and hopefully I will.Anonymous
September 08, 2008
Exchange 2007 advertisment service fails without error messages and rebuild does not help. Users see the problem when using Outlook 2007. OutOfOffice assistant does not work. Schedule meetings with other users will make Outlook crash. All works fine with OWA and previous versions of Outlook. All this started right after installation of .NET 3.5sp1. Uninstall did not solve the problems. Microsoft is working on the issue for the second week now.Anonymous
September 08, 2008
Exchange 2007 advertisment service fails without error messages and rebuild does not help. Users see the problem when using Outlook 2007. OutOfOffice assistant does not work. Schedule meetings with other users will make Outlook crash. All works fine with OWA and previous versions of Outlook. All this started right after installation of .NET 3.5sp1. Uninstall did not solve the problems. Microsoft is working on the issue for the second week now.Anonymous
September 08, 2008
Here's a link listing a few issues as well: http://www.ayende.com/Blog/archive/2008/08/15/Waiting-for-the-Service-Pack-I-dont-think-so.aspx In my opinion, the SP introduced way too many issues - including a few hard bugs; that's very uncommon, especially with service packs from Microsoft. Fabian (BTW: I'm getting the "console is undefined" error, too. IE 7, Server 2003, debugging on)Anonymous
September 10, 2008
The comment has been removedAnonymous
September 10, 2008
I've found the way to reliably repro the issue and have opened a bug on MS Connect: https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=367121Anonymous
September 26, 2008
it seems that the System.AccessViolationException that I was looking at for JeroenH was caused by using the Remotesoft .NET Protector. This is a known issue with it. So the only ways to fix it are to not use that or to talk to Remotesoft about fixing the problem. If anyone is not using that and has the System.AccessViolationException issue, please let me know.Anonymous
September 30, 2008
I am having an issue with a site that uses AspDotNetStoreFront. I am getting the System.AccessViolationException exception. I will check tonight if the store is using remotesoft and if they are not I will see if I can get a dump to send to you.Anonymous
October 09, 2008
I had a huge issue with TFS once I installed .Net 3.5 SP1 and attempted an upgrade to TFS2008 from TFS2005. I wound up having to get Premier involved (case # SRZ080913000002). We took the approach of uninstalling .Net 3, .Net 3.5, and .Net 2.0 and reinstalling .Net 2.0. I find it absolutely insane that the install of .Net 3.5 Sp1 includes a bundle for .Net 2.0 SP2 and that install winds up uninstalling 2.0 and 2.0 SP1 . Too much risk for a SP install on a production web server or code server.Anonymous
October 09, 2008
Alan, So you left 3.5 SP1 off your machine correct?Anonymous
October 17, 2008
Hello i have download and installed .net 3.5 with sp1 i din't get all the controls in my toolbox how to get de m plz reply i need map , media player and some other controls help me thank youAnonymous
October 17, 2008
Gangadhar, I think it depends on what kind of project you create in Visual Studio. Try creating a Futures project.Anonymous
October 23, 2008
Hi, Like JeroenH and kamii47 I have a System.AccessViolationException. It occurred just after I installed the new .Framework 3.5 SP1. The strange thing about that is that it occurs only on the Release build. To be more precise, I have a c# .Net project which builds dynamically dlls using some IL instructions. I may test a build dll by referencing them manualy in the project and calling the differents methods within it in a console application project. The test runs ok in Debug but not in Release. I have all ok on servers that are still on the Framework 2.0 The bug occured just after the FWRK 3.5 SP1 installation. Thank you for your help.Anonymous
October 23, 2008
Dear Sir, In a precedent post you said "If anyone is not using that and has the System.AccessViolationException issue, please let me know". I also have a System.AccessViolationException since .Net Framework 3.5 SP1 installation on an application that ran perfectly well before the installation. The application generate a dynamic assembly, generated on the fly, that run as a database mapping layer. Here is an extract of the logs : DynamicFactorybinRelease>DynamicFactoryTester.exe System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt. at __generated__1_reader(Object , IDataReader , Dictionary2 , Boolean ) at com.dynamic.factory.SingleRowFactory.CreateList[T,TKey,TValue](IDataReader reader, Boolean getAllItems, Dictionary2 parameters) The "__generated__1_reader" method is build dynamically, as I said earlier : it does not exist before the program starts. The strange thing is that the exception is thrown only in Release configuration. This seems to be a security issue, but I don't know what to do. Thank you for your help.Anonymous
October 26, 2008
Can you email me Philippe? I'd like to get a sample if possible to investigate this. You can email me from: http://blogs.msdn.com/tom/contact.aspx ThanksAnonymous
October 28, 2008
The comment has been removedAnonymous
November 17, 2008
Well Microsoft Net Framework 3.5 SP1 just crashed on me. My web site is down.. My application Event logs on Windows 2003 R2 Standard says the framework is the problem. So I'm trying to find a solution to this problemAnonymous
November 18, 2008
I keep getting a similar error, except that the faulting module is kernel32.dll. This happens on a 64-bit Windows 2003 Server with .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 installed. Here's what goes into the Application Event Log: Faulting application w3wp.exe, version 6.0.3790.3959, stamp 45d6968e, faulting module kernel32.dll, version 5.2.3790.4062, stamp 4626467c It worked fine on my 32-bit Windows XP development machine (with .NET 3.5 SP1 installed) but after uploading to the demo server to show it to some clients, it turned out that it crashes the IIS worker process at some point.Anonymous
November 19, 2008
Michael, Can you give more details on the problem? If you really need to figure it out, it may be best to open up a support case with Microsoft.Anonymous
November 19, 2008
Ludmil, It will probably be best to capture a dump at the time of the crash. Are you using anything from Remotesoft?Anonymous
November 20, 2008
I had the AccessViolation exception on a production web server running multiple sites. Mostly on the AspDotNetStoreFront sites. Some of the other sites was throwing random errors, can't remember any of them, but those sites were all .net 2.0 sites. I went to uninstall 3.5 sp1 and it trashed all of the .net installs. I couldn't uninstall or re-install any of them. I ended up going through the registry, removing anything related to .net, removed the c:windowsmicrosoft .netframework folders. And then I was able to re-install .net 1.1 following a microsoft kb on how to re-install.net 1.1 on a 2003 server, and then installed 2.0, then 2.0 sp1 Now all is well.Anonymous
December 02, 2008
The comment has been removedAnonymous
December 03, 2008
Daniel, Are you using anything from Remotesoft? If not, the best advice I can offer is to call Microsoft support. They should be able to get it resolved and get you running again.Anonymous
December 03, 2008
Thanks Tom, No, I'm not running anything from Remotesoft. I ended up searching some more forums, and concluded that the best plan was to repair the installation of VS2008, reinstall VS2008 SP1 and install the latest Service Pack for SQL Server 2005. There's a chance that this has helped things, but it's a bit early to know for sure, DanielAnonymous
December 04, 2008
Daniel, If you have a specific error message after doing that, let me know and I can see about figuring out what it is. If not, I would say to have support help, unless you have more time to look into it on your own.Anonymous
December 07, 2008
The comment has been removedAnonymous
December 09, 2008
Andrew, I would be interested in seeing them. You can either post them here or send them to me in an email using the contact form on here.Anonymous
December 19, 2008
The comment has been removedAnonymous
December 23, 2008
The comment has been removedAnonymous
December 30, 2008
Just a follow-up. The issue described in my previous post was in fact not solution path related. It was finally cleared up by deleting the .suo file of the solution with the debugging issue and the logged error messages.Anonymous
February 09, 2009
Installing .Net 3.5 SP1 or .Net 2.0 SP2 I get this exception: System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt. I'm generating dynamic assemblies, generated on the fly, using System.Emit. Is there any fix or workaround for this issue?Anonymous
February 09, 2009
I held off installing 3.5 sp1 but eventually took the plunge, wish I had not. After install when my system rebooted the os started loading new personal/default settings ect. It did not delete anything but lots of desktop icons were gone and the desktop background was changed. Had to do a system restore. Win XP SP3Anonymous
February 10, 2009
Would it be possible for me to get a dump of one of the processes when the AccessViolation occurs?Anonymous
February 10, 2009
Gerry, What icons are you talking about? Can you tell me what changed?Anonymous
February 12, 2009
Tom, regarding the post "# Luis said on February 9, 2009 12:26 PM:" asking for a dump, I used Debug Diagnostic Tool and this is the result: DESCRIPTION: In JetBrains.ReSharper.TaskRunner__PID__4788__Date__02_12_2009__Time_05_01_54PM__41__First chance exception 0XC0000005.dmp the assembly instruction at mscorjit!Compiler::optCreateAssertion+1f in C:WINDOWSMicrosoft.NETFrameworkv2.0.50727mscorjit.dll from Microsoft Corporation has caused an access violation exception (0xC0000005) when trying to read from memory location 0x00000000 on thread 10 RECOMMENDATION: Please follow up with the vendor Microsoft Corporation for C:WINDOWSMicrosoft.NETFrameworkv2.0.50727mscorjit.dll THREAD 10: Entry point mscorwks!Thread::intermediateThreadProc Create time 12/02/2009 05:01:52 p.m. Time spent in user mode 0 Days 0:0:1.343 Time spent in kernel mode 0 Days 0:0:0.234 Function Arg 1 Arg 2 Arg 3 Source mscorjit!Compiler::optCreateAssertion+1f 00000000 00000000 00000001 mscorjit!Compiler::optAssertionGen+169 01e536ec 00e536ec 00e50010 mscorjit!Compiler::fgMorphTreeDone+59 00e536ec 00e536ec 00e537b8 mscorjit!Compiler::fgMorphTree+147 00e536ec 00000000 00e52cb8 mscorjit!Compiler::fgMorphStmts+61 00e52cb8 0474e72b 0474e72a mscorjit!Compiler::fgMorphBlocks+78 00e50010 7906513e 00e50010 mscorjit!Compiler::fgMorph+5a 00e50010 0474e974 0474e790 mscorjit!Compiler::compCompile+83 0474e838 0474ea80 00107010 mscorjit!Compiler::compCompile+44f 05314d44 00000000 0474e974 mscorjit!jitNativeCode+ef 0474e9fc 0474e974 0474e838 mscorjit!CILJit::compileMethod+25 790b7268 0474e9fc 0474e974 mscorwks!invokeCompileMethodHelper+72 001820c0 0474e9fc 0474e974 mscorwks!invokeCompileMethod+31 001820c0 0474e9fc 0474e974 mscorwks!CallCompileMethodWithSEHWrapper+5b 001820c0 0474e9fc 0474e974 mscorwks!UnsafeJitFunction+31b 053172d8 05258278 00107010 mscorwks!MethodDesc::MakeJitWorker+1a8 05258278 00000000 1ae470ab mscorwks!MethodDesc::DoPrestub+41b 0531739c 1ae4737b 0474f164 mscorwks!PreStubWorker+f3 0474ee64 1a35f4a2 0144d8f4 0x003b1efe 003b1efe 00000000 00000000 mscorwks!PreStubWorker+141 014c7544 79e82279 0474ef80 mscorwks!CallDescrWorker+33 0474efd0 00000000 0474efa0 mscorwks!CallDescrWorkerWithHandler+a3 0474efd0 00000000 0474efa0 mscorwks!MethodDesc::CallDescr+19c 03b9a1c0 0474f200 0474f110 mscorwks!MethodDesc::CallTargetWorker+1f 03b9a1c0 0474f200 0474f110 mscorwks!MethodDescCallSite::CallWithValueTypes+1a 0474f110 0474f2b8 79f7762b mscorwks!InvokeImpl+550 03bd7e28 014ccddc 00000000 mscorwks!RuntimeMethodHandle::InvokeMethodFast+bd 03bd7e9c 00000086 0474f3a0 mscorlib_ni+215348 03bd7e9c 00000086 0154f9c0 mscorlib_ni+21514f 00000000 00000000 00000000 mscorlib_ni+214fde 00000000 04ef40e3 01409bc0 0x03be67b0 01410a14 0147562c 00000000 0x04ef3e5e 0144d268 01410424 01410a14 0x03bbeb28 014b08d4 0474f628 792e01ef mscorlib_ni+216d66 0474f66c 014b08d4 014b08a0 mscorlib_ni+2201ef 01422ae4 00000000 001aaf90 mscorlib_ni+216ce4 7c97be00 0474f6b8 0474f6d0 mscorwks!CallDescrWorker+33 0474f720 00000000 0474f6f0 mscorwks!CallDescrWorkerWithHandler+a3 0474f720 00000000 0474f6f0 mscorwks!MethodDesc::CallDescr+19c 7924290c 0474f968 0474f8a0 mscorwks!MethodDesc::CallTargetWorker+1f 7924290c 0474f968 0474f8a0 mscorwks!MethodDescCallSite::CallWithValueTypes+1a 0474f8a0 1ae46767 001aaf90 mscorwks!ThreadNative::KickOffThread_Worker+192 0474fd50 001aaf90 00000000 mscorwks!Thread::DoADCallBack+32a 0474fcc4 0474fac4 79f7762b mscorwks!Thread::ShouldChangeAbortToUnload+e3 0474fcc4 1ae46643 001aaf90 mscorwks!Thread::ShouldChangeAbortToUnload+30a 0474fcc4 001aaf90 0474fbcc mscorwks!Thread::RaiseCrossContextException+434 0474fcc4 0474fbc0 79f7762b mscorwks!Thread::DoADCallBack+da 00000002 79fd87f6 0474fcc4 mscorwks!Thread::DoADCallBack+310 0474fcc4 0474fc70 79f7762b mscorwks!Thread::ShouldChangeAbortToUnload+e3 0474fcc4 1ae461f7 00000000 mscorwks!Thread::ShouldChangeAbortToUnload+30a 0474fcc4 00000002 00000000 mscorwks!Thread::ShouldChangeAbortToUnload+33e 00000002 79f3d769 0474fd50 mscorwks!ManagedThreadBase::KickOff+13 00000002 79f3d769 0474fd50 mscorwks!ThreadNative::KickOffThread+269 001c7a30 8ee6aa04 8efeaac4 mscorwks!Thread::intermediateThreadProc+49 001bf5d8 0012b0a0 79e7af69 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+37 79f9205f 001bf5d8 00000000 MSCORJIT!COMPILER::OPTCREATEASSERTION+1FIn JetBrains.ReSharper.TaskRunner__PID__4788__Date__02_12_2009__Time_05_01_54PM__41__First chance exception 0XC0000005.dmp the assembly instruction at mscorjit!Compiler::optCreateAssertion+1f in C:WINDOWSMicrosoft.NETFrameworkv2.0.50727mscorjit.dll from Microsoft Corporation has caused an access violation exception (0xC0000005) when trying to read from memory location 0x00000000 on thread 10 Module Information Image Name: C:WINDOWSMicrosoft.NETFrameworkv2.0.50727mscorjit.dll Symbol Type: PDB Base address: 0x79060000 Time Stamp: Mon Nov 24 22:46:57 2008 Checksum: 0x00063f75 Comments: Flavor=Retail COM DLL: False Company Name: Microsoft Corporation ISAPIExtension: False File Description: Microsoft .NET Runtime Just-In-Time Compiler ISAPIFilter: False File Version: 2.0.50727.3082 (QFE.050727-3000) Managed DLL: False Internal Name: mscorjit.dll VB DLL: False Legal Copyright: © Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Loaded Image Name: mscorjit.dll Legal Trademarks: Mapped Image Name: Original filename: mscorjit.dll Module name: mscorjit Private Build: Single Threaded: False Product Name: Microsoft® .NET Framework Module Size: 364.00 KBytes Product Version: 2.0.50727.3082 Symbol File Name: c:symcachemscorjit.pdb934D5C2DD37F4A8EA01C91DC700F6EC42mscorjit.pdb Special Build: & The exception is thrown using either Resharper TaskRunner or NUnit GUI or even the real application.Anonymous
February 15, 2009
Luis, Is the application anything you can repro on another machine? Is it something I can see on my machine? We are also trying to get a case and look at the dump here. Hopefully we can find something and report back. If you want to create a case yourself, you can check out http://blogs.msdn.com/tom/archive/2007/11/15/contacting-tom.aspxAnonymous
February 17, 2009
Hi Tom, if the machine has .Net 2 SP2 or .Net 3.5 SP1, you can reproduce the error. I have a little solution (C# projects) where you can reproduce the exception in your machine. I will send the solution to you.Anonymous
March 08, 2009
A client had .Net Framework 3.5 SP1 get installed on an auto update and now when the ASP.Net web site tries to do a post back is crashes their instance. There are no logs being written to indicate what the issue is and from a debugging window in VS it says the the Internet connectivity has been lost which it has not. Everything looks to me like the session state is corrupted. Very frustrating and I am not sure if can be resolved other than to remove SP1.Anonymous
March 18, 2009
The comment has been removedAnonymous
December 26, 2009
The comment has been removedAnonymous
April 27, 2010
I am getting the same error as JOHN. Faulting application w3wp.exe, version 6.0.3790.3959, stamp 45d6968e, faulting module mscorwks.dll, version 2.0.50727.3053, stamp 4889dc18, debug? 0, fault address 0x0001fb17. Has anyone got any solution for the same? Thanks, Samir ShahAnonymous
September 18, 2011
The comment has been removed