Detecting 802.1p Priority Tags

Consider a case where a network application calls Windows QoS APIs to add a layer-2 IEEE 802.1Q UserPriority tag (almost always referred to as 802.1p) to outgoing traffic. Ascertaining whether the tag actually got added to an outgoing packet is not as simple as it seems due to the nature of how the Windows network stack is designed, and how framing actually occurs. From an internal implementation perspective, The QoS Packet Scheduler (Pacer.sys in Vista/2008 Server, and Psched.sys in XP/2003 Server) in the network stack merely updates an out-of-band structure (not the actual formed packet) that an 802.1Q UserPriority tag should be added. The specific NDIS structure is NDIS_NET_BUFFER_LIST_8021Q_INFO, which contains member variables for both VlanID and UserPriority, and is passed to the NDIS miniport driver for implementing both priority tagging (UserPriority) and VLAN (VlanId). It is up to the NDIS miniport driver to actually insert the 802.1Q tag into the frame based on these values before transmitting on the wire. A miniport driver will only insert this tag if the feature is supported and enabled in the advanced properties of the NIC driver; typically layer-2 priority tagging is disabled by default.

From a network stack layering perspective, it’s important to understand that Pacer.sys is an NDIS Lightweight Filter (LWF) driver, and will always be inserted above a miniport driver, which will always be the lowest network software in the stack because it communicates directly with the NIC hardware. Also note that network sniffing applications like NetMon and WireShark are also network stack filters, and will always be inserted above the miniport driver. This is important knowledge because it should be clear that taking a network sniff of traffic on the sending PC will never show the tag in a packet (because the tag gets added below the sniffing software). Also, the QoS Packet Scheduler can't know for absolute certainty whether the miniport driver added the tag to the outgoing packet. 

What about trying to do a network sniff on the receiving PC? Good question, but also will show the layer-2 tag not present in packets. The reason for this is NDIS developer documentation clearly states that miniport drivers must strip the tag when received, and populate the NDIS_NET_BUFFER_LIST_8021Q_INFO UserPriority and VlanId fields with the values in the tag. This out-of-band structure can then be used by NDIS filter drivers higher up in the stack for implementing these features. The functional reason for stripping the layer-2 tag is because Tcpip.sys will drop any received packet that contains this tag. Therefore, if a misbehaving miniport driver does not strip the tag, the packet will never be received by the user-mode application because it will be dropped internally.

In conclusion:

  • A network sniffing app on the sending PC will never see a tag
  • A network sniffing app on the receiving PC will never see a tag
    • Unless the miniport driver is misbehaving, which will result in dropped packets
  • Monitoring tagged packets from intermediate network elements (such as a switch) is hard if at all possible
    • Perhaps a clever SNMP counter could be used, but would depend on the device manufacturer

If you have not came to this conclusion already, the only way to determine whether a layer-2 tag got added on the sending PC and/or received by the receiving PC is to monitor the NDIS_NET_BUFFER_LIST_8021Q_INFO.UserPriority field. Stay tuned for a follow-up post which describes how to do this.

-- Gabe Frost

Comments

  • Anonymous
    September 11, 2007
    Gabe, Interesting stuff.  I need to implement what's coming in your next blog. In your description you mention that the Pacer.sys is always inserted directly above the miniport driver, however I cannot determine from your blog if this was also the case for the Psched.sys in XP.   My reason for asking is that I have been able to see 802.1p tagging in a Packet Capture on a Windows XP machine while running a WinPCap based tool. I admit this was on packets between different PCs. Does this mean that:
  1. I have a misbehaving miniport driver?
  2. The "WinPCap.sys" is inserted between the miniport driver and the Psched.sys on XP?
  3. It is possible to see packet tagging on packets between other PCs? Thanks, Rich
  • Anonymous
    September 12, 2007
    The comment has been removed
  • Anonymous
    September 12, 2007
    Rich, On another note, can you describe the scenario for which you need to know that an 802.1p tag exists in a frame, and whether that is on send and/or receive? Is this a debugging tool or tracing application? Thanks!
  • Gabe
  • Anonymous
    September 13, 2007
    Gabe, Thanks for the responses, I'll recreate my test where I saw tags and let you know what I find. To answer your question about why I want to know about the tags; we develop VoIP test applications.   In one scenario, we have a VoIP test-point which needs to confirm that the incoming stream is correctly tagged.  In a second scenario, we monitor passing VoIP streams and I need to add the capability to check the tagging of these streams.  I both cases I am interested in knowing the tag value of received packets. Rich

  • Anonymous
    September 16, 2007
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    September 17, 2007
    No problem Rich, I greatly appreciate your feedback. Keep watching this blog for more in-depth information about QoS capabilities, as well as tools for validation. We're always eager to hear how we're doing from a community aspect.

  • Anonymous
    October 19, 2007
    Would it be possible to connect the sender and receiver through a software bridge (two network connections bridged in the OS) and sniff the bridge to see the QoS tag? ______        _______       _______ | SUT   |<-->| Bridge |<-->| Client  | ----------       -----------        -----------

  • Anonymous
    November 16, 2007
    Hi Bob, Wow, that's creative. Great thought, but that unfortunately won't work. Bridging two interfaces within Windows won't buy you anything because the sent packet doesn't actually go all the way down to the miniport (which would add the tag), then back up. -- Gabe

  • Anonymous
    February 04, 2008
    Hi Gabe,   Sorry to step back to XP, 2000, but I am wondering how the NDIS IM driver(5.1, 4.0) is layed in the network driver stack?  Is the Psched.sys sitting below the NDIS IM driver or on the top of IM driver?   I am facing a tough issue.  We have a NDIS 4.0 IM driver that applies a custom TOS/DSCP value to our kernel socket for the VoIP traffic by modifying the TOS byte directly before sending to the miniport.  I know it is not the way to do the QoS but it seems to be working in 2000, XP and 2003 for our own VoIP app and it was determined to implement this way long time ago.     Now I am asked to enhance this IM driver to support 802.1p.  Since I am not using the Vista, NDIS_PER_PACKET_INFO_FROM_PACKET(_Packet, Ieee8021pPriority) seems to the point to get/set 802.1p priority value.    Do you think if it is possible to apply the 802.1p tag by changing this Ieee8021pPriority OOB info in NDIS IM driver providing I enable the 802.1p on the NIC and enable the Packet Scheduler(do I really need it since I am not going to use it anyway?).   I know it should be viable to implement this with TC API(even with any 802.1p value, right?) but then I believe it would affect our current TOS implementation and I pretty much need to redo everything.  So I am little hesitate to go for this if our existing IM driver can do the job.   Thanks, William

  • Anonymous
    April 01, 2008
    Hi, I met this same question a few days ago.As Bob mentioned above, I have implemented a software bridge in Windows2003,and I can now see 802.1q tag with sniffer.To my puzzled,sniffer cann't see 802.1q tag in Windows2000,only work fine in Windows2003,I am not sure whether there are some kernel differences between 2000 and 2003. Ajean

  • Anonymous
    April 07, 2008
    Windows 2k didn't support 802.1 so I guess the protocol isn't enabling the option in the miniport (default is off) by sending an OID even if the miniport supported it.

  • Anonymous
    April 09, 2008
    Gabe- Will I be able to see the 802.1p values with the help of network analyzer (Finisar for example) installed between teo hosts?