Using classic Outlook for Windows in business environments
Please note that our forum is a public platform, and we will modify your question to hide your personal information in the description. Kindly ensure that you hide any personal or organizational information the next time you post an error or other details to protect personal data.
Thank you for reaching out to Microsoft Q&A forum
From your screenshot, the rule condition is not actually checking the Subject line, it’s checking the message header (“with ‘CO ’ or ‘CO’ or ‘CO:’ or ‘Change Order’ in the message header”)
That’s why it’s catching messages that don’t have those terms in the subject: many emails will contain “co” somewhere in their headers, so the rule ends up matching far more mail than intended.
So, you can try the instructions below to see if it can help you:
- Go to File → Manage Rules & Alerts.
- Select your rule → Change Rule → Edit Rule Settings.
- In the conditions page:
- Uncheck anything like “with specific words in the message header” (that’s the broad match).
- Check “with specific words in the subject” (or “subject includes”, depending on what your wizard shows).
- Click the underlined “specific words” and add your terms as separate entries (don’t type quotes and don’t type
or):-
CO: -
CO(CO + a trailing space) -
Change Order: Avoid using plainCOby itself unless you truly mean “any subject containing the letters c-o anywhere”, because that can match lots of unrelated subjects (and definitely lots of headers).
-
- Keep your action as “move a copy to the CHANGE ORDERS folder” (that part is fine).
- Use Run Rules Now to test against a small set (or your Inbox) after saving, so you can confirm it only grabs the intended subjects.
Hope my answer will help you.
If the answer is helpful, please click "Accept Answer" and kindly upvote it. If you have extra questions about this answer, please click "Comment".
Note: Please follow the steps in our documentation to enable e-mail notifications if you want to receive the related email notification for this thread.