As a Beta Tester, I can assure you that we have taken Microsoft to task over a number of changes that they have made, including this issue in particular. Unfortunately, in this case, Microsoft's response was that the way in which Text Boundaries
worked in earlier versions was not the way that it was supposed to be and no amount of objections to the new arrangement had any influence on them.
Thanks a lot for your comments, Doug. But it is really disappointing to see the way Microsoft leads with such things. Something useful, up and running and suddenly, in a new Office release, just disappeared. It is a pity.
I've used Word since it's first version. I must agree that the "new" implementation of text boundaries is unproductive and highly annoying in it's implementation. If they insist on keeping this implementation, they need to give individual options for page/section
and paragraph boundaries instead of the one wretched setting which makes the feature useless.
I find it difficult to believe that a feature that yielded a page/section format feature is now tied to paragraphs because "it was always supposed to be that way". Consider how the boundaries worked in previous versions. Regardless of the paragraphs in a
section, the boundaries were unaltered. Paragraphs could cross those boundaries. Multiple paragraph formats could be combined in the same section, still the text boundaries remained reflecting the margins of the section.
I can see a use for the "paragraph" boundaries if laying out a newsletter or document with heavy percentages of graphics, equations, etc. For normal business documents, why in the world would you use them? The text boundaries showing the sectional margins,
on the other hand, are always useful.
Why do they insist on dumbing-down an excellent application. Product "enhancements" should not render users less productive. Thank you everyone. This is has been an informative discussion even if disappointing.