Virtual WAN with Site-to-Site VPN - no communication between VNET and on-premises

Arvind Bassan 25 Reputation points
2024-04-14T21:30:20.4733333+00:00

I have implemented a Standard Virtual WAN with a Hub and attached a VNET.

Next, I implemented Site-to-Site VPN in the same Hub between Azure and OracleCloud.

The VPN tunnel and BGP status are UP, but I am not able to ping between Azure VNET and OracleCloud.

Is there any special routing or gateway required to make this communication happen?

I have attached a high-level architecture for your reference.

V_WAN.jpg

Azure Virtual WAN
Azure Virtual WAN
An Azure virtual networking service that provides optimized and automated branch-to-branch connectivity.
229 questions
Azure VPN Gateway
Azure VPN Gateway
An Azure service that enables the connection of on-premises networks to Azure through site-to-site virtual private networks.
1,561 questions
Azure Virtual Network
Azure Virtual Network
An Azure networking service that is used to provision private networks and optionally to connect to on-premises datacenters.
2,526 questions
{count} votes

Accepted answer
  1. GitaraniSharma-MSFT 49,591 Reputation points Microsoft Employee
    2024-04-16T12:02:56.9166667+00:00

    Hello @Arvind Bassan ,

    Welcome to Microsoft Q&A Platform. Thank you for reaching out & hope you are doing well.

    I understand that you've implemented a Standard Azure Virtual WAN with a Hub and attached a VNET and configured a Site-to-Site VPN in the same Hub between Azure and OracleCloud. The VPN tunnel and BGP status are UP, but you are unable to ping between Azure VNET and OracleCloud.

    Branch-to-VNet is the primary path supported by Azure Virtual WAN. This path allows you to connect branches to Azure IAAS enterprise workloads that are deployed in Azure VNets. The traffic transits to VNets that are connected to the virtual WAN hubs via VNet Connections. Explicit gateway transit isn't required for Virtual WAN because Virtual WAN automatically enables gateway transit to branch site.

    Refer: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-wan/virtual-wan-global-transit-network-architecture#branch-to-vnet-a-and-branch-to-vnet-cross-region-g

    Your scenario should be something similar to Any-to-Any routing as mentioned in the below article:

    https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-wan/scenario-any-to-any

    So, as long as the Vnet connection and the branch are connected to the default route table and there is no address space overlap, it should work.

    Could you please check if the route table is associated correctly?

    Refer: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-wan/how-to-virtual-hub-routing

    Additionally, you could check the below:

    • Validate the Vnet connection configuration and make sure that it is associated to a route table.

    Refer: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-wan/howto-connect-vnet-hub

    • Validate the virtual hub effective routes to see if your hub is learning the route of your branch site.

    Refer: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-wan/effective-routes-virtual-hub

    • Validate the BGP dashboard to check the advertised and learned routes.

    Refer: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-wan/monitor-bgp-dashboard

    • If you have overlapping address spaces, then you need to configure NAT rules.

    Refer: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-wan/nat-rules-vpn-gateway

    Kindly let us know if the above helps or you need further assistance on this issue.


    Please "Accept the answer" if the information helped you. This will help us and others in the community as well.


0 additional answers

Sort by: Most helpful

Your answer

Answers can be marked as Accepted Answers by the question author, which helps users to know the answer solved the author's problem.