How to restrict only one view to specific users in Sharepoint online

Anonymous
2024-01-31T15:58:42+00:00

Hi,

I have two views for one list. One is for admins which sees both views and the second one is for users without admin rights. This view I called public view.

This public view should be visible for standard user when he visits the site. I would like him to have such permission like downloading the document and nothing more. I mean no edit possibility, change between views. Only possibility to download document for himself.

Is there any chance to create sth like this?

Microsoft 365 and Office | SharePoint | For business | Windows

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments No comments
{count} votes

15 answers

Sort by: Most helpful
  1. matt howell 3,501 Reputation points
    2024-11-13T01:13:37+00:00

    The solution I posted above using SP Designer is working fine for me-and others.

    0 comments No comments
  2. Anonymous
    2024-11-19T08:58:51+00:00

    Hello

    need to go to Settings/Advanced settings of your view, select "Create and Modify items created by the user". Means that the user can only modify his records, but can't modify the records of his team. I have done that for a calendar view connected to an custom in-app Teams.

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  3. Anonymous
    2024-12-20T14:18:51+00:00

    I don't see the "view level permission option". I'm using SharePoint online.

    Any help with this is greatly appreciated. Thank you!

    0 comments No comments
  4. Anonymous
    2025-01-14T14:29:41+00:00

    Your own references contradict what you've said lol.

    This isn't possible.

    0 comments No comments
  5. matt howell 3,501 Reputation points
    2025-01-14T14:49:40+00:00

    I don't see the "view level permission option". I'm using SharePoint online.

    Because it doesn't exist. My response above includes a workaround that works.

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments