Muokkaa

Jaa


How to safely cast by using pattern matching and the is and as operators

Because objects are polymorphic, it's possible for a variable of a base class type to hold a derived type. To access the derived type's instance members, it's necessary to cast the value back to the derived type. However, a cast creates the risk of throwing an InvalidCastException. C# provides pattern matching statements that perform a cast conditionally only when it will succeed. C# also provides the is and as operators to test if a value is of a certain type.

The following example shows how to use the pattern matching is statement:

var g = new Giraffe();
var a = new Animal();
FeedMammals(g);
FeedMammals(a);
// Output:
// Eating.
// Animal is not a Mammal

SuperNova sn = new SuperNova();
TestForMammals(g);
TestForMammals(sn);

static void FeedMammals(Animal a)
{
    if (a is Mammal m)
    {
        m.Eat();
    }
    else
    {
        // variable 'm' is not in scope here, and can't be used.
        Console.WriteLine($"{a.GetType().Name} is not a Mammal");
    }
}

static void TestForMammals(object o)
{
    // You also can use the as operator and test for null
    // before referencing the variable.
    var m = o as Mammal;
    if (m != null)
    {
        Console.WriteLine(m.ToString());
    }
    else
    {
        Console.WriteLine($"{o.GetType().Name} is not a Mammal");
    }
}
// Output:
// I am an animal.
// SuperNova is not a Mammal

class Animal
{
    public void Eat() { Console.WriteLine("Eating."); }
    public override string ToString()
    {
        return "I am an animal.";
    }
}
class Mammal : Animal { }
class Giraffe : Mammal { }

class SuperNova { }

The preceding sample demonstrates a few features of pattern matching syntax. The if (a is Mammal m) statement combines the test with an initialization assignment. The assignment occurs only when the test succeeds. The variable m is only in scope in the embedded if statement where it has been assigned. You can't access m later in the same method. The preceding example also shows how to use the as operator to convert an object to a specified type.

You can also use the same syntax for testing if a nullable value type has a value, as shown in the following example:

int i = 5;
PatternMatchingNullable(i);

int? j = null;
PatternMatchingNullable(j);

double d = 9.78654;
PatternMatchingNullable(d);

PatternMatchingSwitch(i);
PatternMatchingSwitch(j);
PatternMatchingSwitch(d);

static void PatternMatchingNullable(ValueType? val)
{
    if (val is int j) // Nullable types are not allowed in patterns
    {
        Console.WriteLine(j);
    }
    else if (val is null) // If val is a nullable type with no value, this expression is true
    {
        Console.WriteLine("val is a nullable type with the null value");
    }
    else
    {
        Console.WriteLine("Could not convert " + val.ToString());
    }
}

static void PatternMatchingSwitch(ValueType? val)
{
    switch (val)
    {
        case int number:
            Console.WriteLine(number);
            break;
        case long number:
            Console.WriteLine(number);
            break;
        case decimal number:
            Console.WriteLine(number);
            break;
        case float number:
            Console.WriteLine(number);
            break;
        case double number:
            Console.WriteLine(number);
            break;
        case null:
            Console.WriteLine("val is a nullable type with the null value");
            break;
        default:
            Console.WriteLine("Could not convert " + val.ToString());
            break;
    }
}

The preceding sample demonstrates other features of pattern matching to use with conversions. You can test a variable for the null pattern by checking specifically for the null value. When the runtime value of the variable is null, an is statement checking for a type always returns false. The pattern matching is statement doesn't allow a nullable value type, such as int? or Nullable<int>, but you can test for any other value type. The is patterns from the preceding example aren't limited to the nullable value types. You can also use those patterns to test if a variable of a reference type has a value or it's null.

The preceding sample also shows how you use the type pattern in a switch statement where the variable may be one of many different types.

If you want to test if a variable is a given type, but not assign it to a new variable, you can use the is and as operators for reference types and nullable value types. The following code shows how to use the is and as statements that were part of the C# language before pattern matching was introduced to test if a variable is of a given type:

// Use the is operator to verify the type.
// before performing a cast.
Giraffe g = new();
UseIsOperator(g);

// Use the as operator and test for null
// before referencing the variable.
UseAsOperator(g);

// Use pattern matching to test for null
// before referencing the variable
UsePatternMatchingIs(g);

// Use the as operator to test
// an incompatible type.
SuperNova sn = new();
UseAsOperator(sn);

// Use the as operator with a value type.
// Note the implicit conversion to int? in
// the method body.
int i = 5;
UseAsWithNullable(i);

double d = 9.78654;
UseAsWithNullable(d);

static void UseIsOperator(Animal a)
{
    if (a is Mammal)
    {
        Mammal m = (Mammal)a;
        m.Eat();
    }
}

static void UsePatternMatchingIs(Animal a)
{
    if (a is Mammal m)
    {
        m.Eat();
    }
}

static void UseAsOperator(object o)
{
    Mammal? m = o as Mammal;
    if (m is not null)
    {
        Console.WriteLine(m.ToString());
    }
    else
    {
        Console.WriteLine($"{o.GetType().Name} is not a Mammal");
    }
}

static void UseAsWithNullable(System.ValueType val)
{
    int? j = val as int?;
    if (j is not null)
    {
        Console.WriteLine(j);
    }
    else
    {
        Console.WriteLine("Could not convert " + val.ToString());
    }
}
class Animal
{
    public void Eat() => Console.WriteLine("Eating.");
    public override string ToString() => "I am an animal.";
}
class Mammal : Animal { }
class Giraffe : Mammal { }

class SuperNova { }

As you can see by comparing this code with the pattern matching code, the pattern matching syntax provides more robust features by combining the test and the assignment in a single statement. Use the pattern matching syntax whenever possible.