Rediģēt

Kopīgot, izmantojot

Improve performance for NFS Azure file shares

  • Raksts

This article explains how you can improve performance for network file system (NFS) Azure file shares.

Applies to

File share type SMB NFS
Standard file shares (GPv2), LRS/ZRS No, this article doesn't apply to standard SMB Azure file shares LRS/ZRS. NFS shares are only available in premium Azure file shares.
Standard file shares (GPv2), GRS/GZRS No, this article doesn't apply to standard SMB Azure file shares GRS/GZRS. NFS is only available in premium Azure file shares.
Premium file shares (FileStorage), LRS/ZRS No, this article doesn't apply to premium SMB Azure file shares. Yes, this article applies to premium NFS Azure file shares.

Increase read-ahead size to improve read throughput

The read_ahead_kb kernel parameter in Linux represents the amount of data that should be "read ahead" or prefetched during a sequential read operation. Linux kernel versions before 5.4 set the read-ahead value to the equivalent of 15 times the mounted file system's rsize, which represents the client-side mount option for read buffer size. This sets the read-ahead value high enough to improve client sequential read throughput in most cases.

However, beginning with Linux kernel version 5.4, the Linux NFS client uses a default read_ahead_kb value of 128 KiB. This small value might reduce the amount of read throughput for large files. Customers upgrading from Linux releases with the larger read-ahead value to releases with the 128 KiB default might experience a decrease in sequential read performance.

For Linux kernels 5.4 or later, we recommend persistently setting the read_ahead_kb to 15 MiB for improved performance.

To change this value, set the read-ahead size by adding a rule in udev, a Linux kernel device manager. Follow these steps:

  1. In a text editor, create the /etc/udev/rules.d/99-nfs.rules file by entering and saving the following text:

    SUBSYSTEM=="bdi" \
, ACTION=="add" \
, PROGRAM="/usr/bin/awk -v bdi=$kernel 'BEGIN{ret=1} {if ($4 == bdi) {ret=0}} END{exit ret}' /proc/fs/nfsfs/volumes" \
, ATTR{read_ahead_kb}="15360"

  2. In a console, apply the udev rule by running the udevadm command as a superuser and reloading the rules files and other databases. You only need to run this command once, to make udev aware of the new file.

    sudo udevadm control --reload

Nconnect

Nconnect is a client-side Linux mount option that increases performance at scale by allowing you to use more Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) connections between the client and the Azure Premium Files service for NFSv4.1.

Benefits of nconnect

With nconnect, you can increase performance at scale using fewer client machines to reduce total cost of ownership (TCO). Nconnect increases performance by using multiple TCP channels on one or more NICs, using single or multiple clients. Without nconnect, you'd need roughly 20 client machines in order to achieve the bandwidth scale limits (10 GiB/s) offered by the largest premium Azure file share provisioning size. With nconnect, you can achieve those limits using only 6-7 clients, reducing compute costs by nearly 70% while providing significant improvements in I/O operations per second (IOPS) and throughput at scale. See the following table.

Metric (operation) I/O size Performance improvement
IOPS (write) 64K, 1024K 3x
IOPS (read) All I/O sizes 2-4x
Throughput (write) 64K, 1024K 3x
Throughput (read) All I/O sizes 2-4x

Prerequisites

  • The latest Linux distributions fully support nconnect. For older Linux distributions, ensure that the Linux kernel version is 5.3 or higher.
  • Per-mount configuration is only supported when a single file share is used per storage account over a private endpoint.

Performance impact of nconnect

We achieved the following performance results when using the nconnect mount option with NFS Azure file shares on Linux clients at scale. For more information on how we achieved these results, see performance test configuration.

Screenshot showing average improvement in IOPS when using nconnect with NFS Azure file shares.

Screenshot showing average improvement in throughput when using nconnect with NFS Azure file shares.

Recommendations for nconnect

Follow these recommendations to get the best results from nconnect.

Set nconnect=4

While Azure Files supports setting nconnect up to the maximum setting of 16, we recommend configuring the mount options with the optimal setting of nconnect=4. Currently, there are no gains beyond four channels for the Azure Files implementation of nconnect. In fact, exceeding four channels to a single Azure file share from a single client might adversely affect performance due to TCP network saturation.

Size virtual machines carefully

Depending on your workload requirements, it’s important to correctly size the client virtual machines (VMs) to avoid being restricted by their expected network bandwidth. You don't need multiple network interface controllers (NICs) in order to achieve the expected network throughput. While it's common to use general purpose VMs with Azure Files, various VM types are available depending on your workload needs and region availability. For more information, see Azure VM Selector.

Keep queue depth less than or equal to 64

Queue depth is the number of pending I/O requests that a storage resource can service. We don't recommend exceeding the optimal queue depth of 64 because you won't see any more performance gains. For more information, see Queue depth.

Nconnect per-mount configuration

If a workload requires mounting multiple shares with one or more storage accounts with different nconnect settings from a single client, we can't guarantee that those settings will persist when mounting over the public endpoint. Per-mount configuration is only supported when a single Azure file share is used per storage account over the private endpoint as described in Scenario 1.

Scenario 1: nconnect per-mount configuration over private endpoint with multiple storage accounts (supported)

  • StorageAccount.file.core.windows.net = 10.10.10.10
  • StorageAccount2.file.core.windows.net = 10.10.10.11
    • Mount StorageAccount.file.core.windows.net:/StorageAccount/FileShare1 nconnect=4
    • Mount StorageAccount2.file.core.windows.net:/StorageAccount2/FileShare1

Scenario 2: nconnect per-mount configuration over public endpoint (not supported)

  • StorageAccount.file.core.windows.net = 52.239.238.8
  • StorageAccount2.file.core.windows.net = 52.239.238.7
    • Mount StorageAccount.file.core.windows.net:/StorageAccount/FileShare1 nconnect=4
    • Mount StorageAccount.file.core.windows.net:/StorageAccount/FileShare2
    • Mount StorageAccount2.file.core.windows.net:/StorageAccount2/FileShare1

Note

Even if the storage account resolves to a different IP address, we can't guarantee that address will persist because public endpoints aren't static addresses.

Scenario 3: nconnect per-mount configuration over private endpoint with multiple shares on single storage account (not supported)

  • StorageAccount.file.core.windows.net = 10.10.10.10
    • Mount StorageAccount.file.core.windows.net:/StorageAccount/FileShare1 nconnect=4
    • Mount StorageAccount.file.core.windows.net:/StorageAccount/FileShare2
    • Mount StorageAccount.file.core.windows.net:/StorageAccount/FileShare3

Performance test configuration

We used the following resources and benchmarking tools to achieve and measure the results outlined in this article.

  • Single client: Azure VM (DSv4-Series) with single NIC
  • OS: Linux (Ubuntu 20.40)
  • NFS storage: Azure Files premium file share (provisioned 30 TiB, set nconnect=4)
Size vCPU Memory Temp storage (SSD) Max data disks Max NICs Expected network bandwidth
Standard_D16_v4 16 64 GiB Remote storage only 32 8 12,500 Mbps

Benchmarking tools and tests

We used Flexible I/O Tester (FIO), a free, open-source disk I/O tool used both for benchmark and stress/hardware verification. To install FIO, follow the Binary Packages section in the FIO README file to install for the platform of your choice.

While these tests focus on random I/O access patterns, you get similar results when using sequential I/O.

High IOPS: 100% reads

4k I/O size - random read - 64 queue depth

fio --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --nrfiles=4 --numjobs=1 --runtime=1800 --time_based --bs=4k --iodepth=64 --filesize=4G --rw=randread --group_reporting --ramp_time=300

8k I/O size - random read - 64 queue depth

fio --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --nrfiles=4 --numjobs=1 --runtime=1800 --time_based --bs=8k --iodepth=64 --filesize=4G --rw=randread --group_reporting --ramp_time=300

High throughput: 100% reads

64k I/O size - random read - 64 queue depth

fio --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --nrfiles=4 --numjobs=1 --runtime=1800 --time_based --bs=64k --iodepth=64 --filesize=4G --rw=randread --group_reporting --ramp_time=300

1024k I/O size - 100% random read - 64 queue depth

fio --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --nrfiles=4 --numjobs=1 --runtime=1800 --time_based --bs=1024k --iodepth=64 --filesize=4G --rw=randread --group_reporting --ramp_time=300

High IOPS: 100% writes

4k I/O size - 100% random write - 64 queue depth

fio --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --nrfiles=4 --numjobs=1 --runtime=1800 --time_based --bs=4k --iodepth=64 --filesize=4G --rw=randwrite --group_reporting --ramp_time=300

8k I/O size - 100% random write - 64 queue depth

fio --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --nrfiles=4 --numjobs=1 --runtime=1800 --time_based --bs=8k --iodepth=64 --filesize=4G --rw=randwrite --group_reporting --ramp_time=300

High throughput: 100% writes

64k I/O size - 100% random write - 64 queue depth

fio --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --nrfiles=4 --numjobs=1 --runtime=1800 --time_based --bs=64k --iodepth=64 --filesize=4G --rw=randwrite --group_reporting --ramp_time=300

1024k I/O size - 100% random write - 64 queue depth

fio --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --nrfiles=4 --numjobs=1 --runtime=1800 --time_based --bs=1024k --iodepth=64 --filesize=4G --rw=randwrite --group_reporting --ramp_time=300

Performance considerations for nconnect

When using the nconnect mount option, you should closely evaluate workloads that have the following characteristics:

  • Latency sensitive write workloads that are single threaded and/or use a low queue depth (less than 16)
  • Latency sensitive read workloads that are single threaded and/or use a low queue depth in combination with smaller I/O sizes

Not all workloads require high-scale IOPS or throughout performance. For smaller scale workloads, nconnect might not make sense. Use the following table to decide whether nconnect is advantageous for your workload. Scenarios highlighted in green are recommended, while scenarios highlighted in red aren't. Scenarios highlighted in yellow are neutral.

Screenshot showing various read and write I O scenarios with corresponding latency to indicate when nconnect is advisable.

See also