Flash in Windows 8
Starting tomorrow, we are updating Internet Explorer 10 in Windows 8 and Windows RT to enable Flash content to run by default. On Windows 8, all Flash content continues to be enabled for IE on the desktop.
As we have seen through testing over the past several months, the vast majority of sites with Flash content are now compatible with the Windows experience for touch, performance, and battery life. With this update, the curated Compatibility View (CV) list blocks Flash content in the small number of sites that are still incompatible with the Windows experience for touch or that depend on other plug-ins.
We believe having more sites “just work” in IE10 improves the experience for consumers, businesses, and developers. As a practical matter, the primary device you walk around with should give you access to all the Web content on the sites you rely on. Otherwise, the device is just a companion to a PC. Because some popular Web sites require Adobe Flash and do not offer HTML5 alternatives, Adobe and Microsoft continue to work together closely to deliver a Flash Player optimized for the Windows experience.
Windows 8 | Windows RT | |
Immersive IE | Enabled unless on CV list | Enabled unless on CV list |
Desktop IE | Enabled for all sites | Enabled unless on CV list |
This updates the immersive IE experience on Windows 8, and both the immersive and desktop IE experiences on Windows RT. The update will be made available to customers with Windows Update. The curated CV list applies to IE on the desktop for Windows RT since the most common reason to block Flash is that the site relies on other plug-ins that are not available on Windows RT.
More compatible Web experiences
Our approach to Flash in Windows is practical for Windows customers and developers. For Windows 8, we worked with Adobe to include a version of Flash that is optimized for touch, performance, security, reliability, and battery life. Adobe made substantial changes to the Flash player to align with the Windows 8 experience goals. We shipped this optimized Flash component as part of Windows 8, and we service it through Windows Update. IE10 with Flash on Windows 8 enables people to see more of the Web working with high quality, especially compared with the experience in other touch-first or tablet browsers and devices.
When we released Windows 8 and Windows RT we used the IE Compatibility View (CV) list to enable sites to run Flash content compatible with the Windows 8 experience, including touch responsiveness, performance, and battery life. In Windows 8, IE on the desktop runs all Flash content, like it does on Windows 7.
Looking at our engineering experience with Flash and Windows 8 and RT, as developers improve their Flash content, the vast majority of sites with Flash content that we have tested are now compatible with the Windows experience goals. Of the thousands of domains tested for Flash compatibility to date, we have found fewer than 4% are still incompatible, in the most part because the core site experience requires other ActiveX controls in addition to Flash. With Windows 8 in the hands of customers and developers, we listened to feedback around the experience of Web sites with Flash.
Developing compatible Flash content
For developers building sites with Flash content, this document posted on MSDN goes into more technical detail about the criteria used to place sites on the Flash CV block list, as well as steps that developers can take to test their content in immersive IE and submit their sites to be removed from the block list. The documentation also includes a best practices guide to help developers, designers, and content publishers create experiences with Flash that play well in IE for touch, responsiveness, and battery life. These best practices complement existing recommendations and tools like modern.IE for authoring touch-friendly HTML5 sites. Also, starting tomorrow, modern.IE enables testing whether or not your site is on the curated Flash CV block list.
For the development community, platform continuity and technology choice are important. Flash in IE10 on Windows 8 and Windows RT provides a bridge for existing sites to transition to HTML5 technologies where it makes sense and at a pace that is right for the experiences they want to deliver to their customers. With today’s update to Windows 8 and Windows RT, consumers can experience more of the Web by default.
-- Rob Mauceri, Group Program Manager, Internet Explorer
Comments
Anonymous
March 11, 2013
Any change for support of Silverlight in IE 10 RT?Anonymous
March 11, 2013
Silverlight, please.Anonymous
March 11, 2013
Support Silverlight too.Anonymous
March 11, 2013
YES! we need Silverlight in Windows RT. Our corporate apps are done with Silverlight.Anonymous
March 11, 2013
So we went from no plugins in IE10 (Therefore killed our projects and moved to a different platform) to Plugins in IE10. This is why I hate developing with MS.Anonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
Silverlight please.Anonymous
March 11, 2013
This is great news! Thanks Microsoft.Anonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
flash4lifeAnonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
And what about Server 2012? Does the same thing occur there too?Anonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
I'm with the others, I want Silverlight support as well. It's a MS product and I hate it when I as a MS developer, go to a MS website using my MS Surface RT, and I can't do something because the MS designers of the MS website used a MS product called MS Silverlight. ARRRRGGGGHHH!!!!Anonymous
March 11, 2013
yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeehhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaAnonymous
March 11, 2013
Great, this is how it should have been from the get go. Well done in FINALLY fixing a glaring error in Windows 8.Anonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
I think Microsoft is abandon Silverlight but it's bored for Windows RT because some web services works only with Silverlight.Anonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
By Web service I think to Bing StreetSide for exemple.Anonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
MS will be saving lots of businesses if Silverlight is supported. So please MS, don't follow others lead but be a leader that will be followed... bring silverlight back!Anonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
Silverlight support would be even awesome to gain more of a foothold in business.Anonymous
March 11, 2013
Silverlight now, you condescending idiots.Anonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
Thanks MS!!!Anonymous
March 11, 2013
Finally a move in the right direction towards what MS always had, user's choice, as most people already mentioned, reconsider SL and make your software stack complete again.Anonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
What!!!???? So, they support the "other guy's plugin", but still don't support their own plugin... Nice support for Silverlight developers! Yay!Anonymous
March 11, 2013
@SVG+SMIL with JS-Fallback for IE?Anonymous
March 11, 2013
Many Thanks, MS!Anonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
user friendly? I think NOT! grrrrrAnonymous
March 11, 2013
Why don't you support Silverlight?Anonymous
March 11, 2013
When the ship is sinking, you clutch at every available straw.Anonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
Great news! This is a better approach, to be sure. I would echo many others here in also saying that Silverlight support in Windows RT, the modern UI version of IE on Windows 8, and maybe even Windows Phone is a much needed and logical next step. In my previous job we spent multiple years and multiple millions of dollars building an incredibly complex LOB Silverlight app that even to this date would still be very difficult (maybe even impossible) to do in HTML5/JavaScript. It's a great shame that Microsoft's own tablet and phone operating systems don't support Microsoft's own (and very fantastic) technology.Anonymous
March 11, 2013
Please allow silverlight for Windows RT as well, we have apps that are required and can't run on RT.Anonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
This is good to see, but the continued silence on Silverlight (in the face of obvious demand) is deafening...Anonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
Silverlight please!!! Many Thanks MS!Anonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
OK THANKSAnonymous
March 11, 2013
Silverlight please!!!!Anonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
Need SilverlightAnonymous
March 11, 2013
Please ENABLE SILVERLIGHT on WindowsRT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THANK YOU!Anonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
Silverlight, please.Anonymous
March 11, 2013
Silverlight is absolutely required, particular on RT. Otherwise the platform is dead. Silverlight is used by most Video on Demand Companies in Europe: Lovefilm(Amazon); Maxdome; Watchever; etc.Anonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
Please enable Silverlight alsoAnonymous
March 11, 2013
We need Silverlight too !Anonymous
March 11, 2013
Silverlight please. Today!Anonymous
March 11, 2013
SILVERLIGHT!Anonymous
March 11, 2013
Silverlight!Anonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
Errrm ok thanks for nothing microsoft, What we actually need is silverlight for RT.....IDIOTS!!!Anonymous
March 11, 2013
Silverlight, please!Anonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
Silverlight please!Anonymous
March 11, 2013
Thanks, great news. Now Silverlight, pretty please!!!!!!!Anonymous
March 11, 2013
As most others: Please add Silverlight! MS put a lot of effort in persuading devs to develope LOB applications using Silverlight. We invested a lot and don't want to have to convert it all to WinRT and lose our Mac compatibility in the process.Anonymous
March 11, 2013
Silverlight&Windows Media Player,please!Anonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
WE ALL NEED SILVERLIGHT ON WINDOWS RT !!!!Anonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
Will wp8 follow?Anonymous
March 11, 2013
I hope the next update contains the Silverlight player!Anonymous
March 11, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 11, 2013
Thank you MS and the IE Team for your work to ensure great user experiences. Ignore the inflammatory self serving comments - the professional developers appreciate your hard work.Anonymous
March 11, 2013
Silverlight you hypocrites!Anonymous
March 12, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 12, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 12, 2013
silverlight suxxx, forget about it.Anonymous
March 12, 2013
Silverlight please ... maybe someone could start a facebook campaign???Anonymous
March 12, 2013
Sinofsky is gone, bring back the SilverlightAnonymous
March 12, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 12, 2013
I second (?!?) the cry for full Silverlight support on Windows 8/RTAnonymous
March 12, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 12, 2013
Can we get the same on Xbox IE?Anonymous
March 12, 2013
pleasAnonymous
March 12, 2013
Silverlight should be built-in into IE10 :( It is really a shame that Microsoft does not supports its own technology. Why should developers stay with Microsoft technologies?Anonymous
March 12, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 12, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 12, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 12, 2013
Leave Silverlight in grave, which it already is. Go further with HTML5.Anonymous
March 13, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 13, 2013
porque no puedoAnonymous
March 13, 2013
how about server 2012 ??Anonymous
March 13, 2013
how about server 2012 ??Anonymous
March 13, 2013
Silverlight!!!Anonymous
March 13, 2013
Now all we need is for them to start supporting their own product that they use on their own websites - Silverlight!!!Anonymous
March 13, 2013
This is great news! Thanks Microsoft.Anonymous
March 14, 2013
Silverlight please!Anonymous
March 14, 2013
I would point you to http://team.silverlight.net for more information on the future of Silverlight (debate and all).Anonymous
March 14, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 16, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 16, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 16, 2013
silverlight please silverlight please silverlight please silverlight please silverlight please silverlight please silverlight please silverlight pleaseAnonymous
March 16, 2013
me gustaAnonymous
March 16, 2013
Silverlight too! you caused us too much pain so far! start thinking more about your customers...Anonymous
March 16, 2013
העגרדAnonymous
March 17, 2013
Hi, How about IE10 on WP8? When will it support embed YouTube vdo?Anonymous
March 17, 2013
Please support your own plugin (silverlight) aswell!!!Anonymous
March 17, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 17, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 17, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 18, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 19, 2013
oke dit is echt zo vervelend want nu kan ik niet eens effe een leuk spelletje spelen op me laptopAnonymous
March 22, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 24, 2013
Silverlight Please...!!Anonymous
March 24, 2013
The comment has been removedAnonymous
March 24, 2013
The comment has been removed