I know a fair amount about coding. Building a huge (really huge) application like Windows involves probably nearly billions of individual machine language instructions. One of the original coding levels for Windows apparently had an error in it, an error that was likely unfindable and required either rewriting Windows or writing a workaround. I discovered one and tried to report it; and was ignored, but the error was remedied within the year, ostensibly by a workaround.
I have little doubt that these workarounds left Windows vulnerable and that these vulnerabilities have been what made Windows susceptible to so many viral attacks. And still the only solution would be to dive impossibly deep into the present coding.
The problem - my guess - is that simply removing a sequence of problematic code would very likely make things worse rather than better. So the best strategy would be to come up with another workaround and patch up the problem. But there are probably other areas that need work in terms of new developments and they may be focusing on that first.
I really don't think it's arrogance for the simple reason that it doesn't pay off in the long run. It might be a mistake to ignore this issue and they might realize that soon. Or it may be that this error will be fixed since so many more users are noticing the problem. I will say that after two years of observing this issue, I cannot attach a single behavioral issue to it. Yes, there have been some issues that seemed related (inevitable coincidences), but everyone of them turned out to be related to something different, such as the computer company (not MS) and was rectified by the company.
For me, I've finally stopped worrying about the issue (essentially, it appears to be a message that relates a problem because it is treating me as though I was a company with all my computers networked, but it doesn't get verification, hence it aborts the attempt). But no discernible home.
Best,
Michael
Michael,
I found similar information from Microsoft. It appears to be useful for corporate IT uses only .
Perhaps it will be more useful to you than it was to me because it exceeds my knowledge level.
Please comment if it adds clarity to the issue at hand.
Windows Autopilot networking requirements | Microsoft Learn
Don