16 Structs

Cikk
02/07/2024

16.1 General

Structs are similar to classes in that they represent data structures that can contain data members and function members. However, unlike classes, structs are value types and do not require heap allocation. A variable of a struct type directly contains the data of the struct, whereas a variable of a class type contains a reference to the data, the latter known as an object.

Note: Structs are particularly useful for small data structures that have value semantics. Complex numbers, points in a coordinate system, or key-value pairs in a dictionary are all good examples of structs. Key to these data structures is that they have few data members, that they do not require use of inheritance or reference semantics, rather they can be conveniently implemented using value semantics where assignment copies the value instead of the reference. end note

As described in §8.3.5, the simple types provided by C#, such as int, double, and bool, are, in fact, all struct types.

16.2 Struct declarations

16.2.1 General

A struct_declaration is a type_declaration (§14.7) that declares a new struct:

struct_declaration
    : attributes? struct_modifier* 'ref'? 'partial'? 'struct'
      identifier type_parameter_list? struct_interfaces?
      type_parameter_constraints_clause* struct_body ';'?
    ;

A struct_declaration consists of an optional set of attributes (§22), followed by an optional set of struct_modifiers (§16.2.2), followed by an optional ref modifier (§16.2.3), followed by an optional partial modifier (§15.2.7), followed by the keyword struct and an identifier that names the struct, followed by an optional type_parameter_list specification (§15.2.3), followed by an optional struct_interfaces specification (§16.2.5), followed by an optional type_parameter_constraints-clauses specification (§15.2.5), followed by a struct_body (§16.2.6), optionally followed by a semicolon.

A struct declaration shall not supply a type_parameter_constraints_clauses unless it also supplies a type_parameter_list.

A struct declaration that supplies a type_parameter_list is a generic struct declaration. Additionally, any struct nested inside a generic class declaration or a generic struct declaration is itself a generic struct declaration, since type arguments for the containing type shall be supplied to create a constructed type (§8.4).

A struct declaration that includes a ref keyword shall not have a struct_interfaces part.

16.2.2 Struct modifiers

A struct_declaration may optionally include a sequence of struct_modifiers:

struct_modifier
    : 'new'
    | 'public'
    | 'protected'
    | 'internal'
    | 'private'
    | 'readonly'
    | unsafe_modifier   // unsafe code support
    ;

unsafe_modifier (§23.2) is only available in unsafe code (§23).

It is a compile-time error for the same modifier to appear multiple times in a struct declaration.

Except for readonly, the modifiers of a struct declaration have the same meaning as those of a class declaration (§15.2.2).

The readonly modifier indicates that the struct_declaration declares a type whose instances are immutable.

A readonly struct has the following constraints:

Each of its instance fields shall also be declared readonly.
None of its instance properties shall have a set_accessor_declaration (§15.7.3).
It shall not declare any field-like events (§15.8.2).

When an instance of a readonly struct is passed to a method, its this is treated like an input argument/parameter, which disallows write access to any instance fields (except by constructors).

16.2.3 Ref modifier

The ref modifier indicates that the struct_declaration declares a type whose instances are allocated on the execution stack. These types are called ref struct types. The ref modifier declares that instances may contain ref-like fields, and shall not be copied out of its safe-context (§16.4.12). The rules for determining the safe context of a ref struct are described in §16.4.12.

It is a compile-time error if a ref struct type is used in any of the following contexts:

As the element type of an array.
As the declared type of a field of a class or a struct that does not have the ref modifier.
Being boxed to System.ValueType or System.Object.
As a type argument.
As the type of a tuple element.
An async method.
An iterator.
There is no conversion from a ref struct type to the type object or the type System.ValueType.
A ref struct type shall not be declared to implement any interface.
An instance method declared in object or in System.ValueType but not overridden in a ref struct type shall not be called with a receiver of that ref struct type.
An instance method of a ref struct type shall not be captured by method group conversion to a delegate type.
A ref struct shall not be captured by a lambda expression or a local function.

Note: A ref struct shall not declare async instance methods nor use a yield return or yield break statement within an instance method, because the implicit this parameter cannot be used in those contexts. end note

These constraints ensure that a variable of ref struct type does not refer to stack memory that is no longer valid, or to variables that are no longer valid.

16.2.4 Partial modifier

The partial modifier indicates that this struct_declaration is a partial type declaration. Multiple partial struct declarations with the same name within an enclosing namespace or type declaration combine to form one struct declaration, following the rules specified in §15.2.7.

16.2.5 Struct interfaces

A struct declaration may include a struct_interfaces specification, in which case the struct is said to directly implement the given interface types. For a constructed struct type, including a nested type declared within a generic type declaration (§15.3.9.7), each implemented interface type is obtained by substituting, for each type_parameter in the given interface, the corresponding type_argument of the constructed type.

struct_interfaces
    : ':' interface_type_list
    ;

The handling of interfaces on multiple parts of a partial struct declaration (§15.2.7) are discussed further in §15.2.4.3.

Interface implementations are discussed further in §18.6.

16.2.6 Struct body

The struct_body of a struct defines the members of the struct.

struct_body
    : '{' struct_member_declaration* '}'
    ;

16.3 Struct members

The members of a struct consist of the members introduced by its struct_member_declarations and the members inherited from the type System.ValueType.

struct_member_declaration
    : constant_declaration
    | field_declaration
    | method_declaration
    | property_declaration
    | event_declaration
    | indexer_declaration
    | operator_declaration
    | constructor_declaration
    | static_constructor_declaration
    | type_declaration
    | fixed_size_buffer_declaration   // unsafe code support
    ;

fixed_size_buffer_declaration (§23.8.2) is only available in unsafe code (§23).

Note: All kinds of class_member_declarations except finalizer_declaration are also struct_member_declarations. end note

Except for the differences noted in §16.4, the descriptions of class members provided in §15.3 through §15.12 apply to struct members as well.

16.4 Class and struct differences

16.4.1 General

Structs differ from classes in several important ways:

Structs are value types (§16.4.2).
All struct types implicitly inherit from the class System.ValueType (§16.4.3).
Assignment to a variable of a struct type creates a copy of the value being assigned (§16.4.4).
The default value of a struct is the value produced by setting all fields to their default value (§16.4.5).
Boxing and unboxing operations are used to convert between a struct type and certain reference types (§16.4.6).
The meaning of this is different within struct members (§16.4.7).
Instance field declarations for a struct are not permitted to include variable initializers (§16.4.8).
A struct is not permitted to declare a parameterless instance constructor (§16.4.9).
A struct is not permitted to declare a finalizer.

16.4.2 Value semantics

Structs are value types (§8.3) and are said to have value semantics. Classes, on the other hand, are reference types (§8.2) and are said to have reference semantics.

A variable of a struct type directly contains the data of the struct, whereas a variable of a class type contains a reference to an object that contains the data. When a struct B contains an instance field of type A and A is a struct type, it is a compile-time error for A to depend on B or a type constructed from B. A struct X directly depends on a struct Y if X contains an instance field of type Y. Given this definition, the complete set of structs upon which a struct depends is the transitive closure of the directly depends on relationship.

Example:
struct Node
{
    int data;
    Node next; // error, Node directly depends on itself
}
is an error because Node contains an instance field of its own type. Another example
struct A { B b; }
struct B { C c; }
struct C { A a; }
is an error because each of the types A, B, and C depend on each other.

end example

With classes, it is possible for two variables to reference the same object, and thus possible for operations on one variable to affect the object referenced by the other variable. With structs, the variables each have their own copy of the data (except in the case of by-reference parameters), and it is not possible for operations on one to affect the other. Furthermore, except when explicitly nullable (§8.3.12), it is not possible for values of a struct type to be null.

Note: If a struct contains a field of reference type then the contents of the object referenced can be altered by other operations. However the value of the field itself, i.e., which object it references, cannot be changed through a mutation of a different struct value. end note

Example: Given the following
struct Point
{
    public int x, y;

    public Point(int x, int y) 
    {
        this.x = x;
        this.y = y;
    }
}

class A
{
    static void Main()
    {
        Point a = new Point(10, 10);
        Point b = a;
        a.x = 100;
        Console.WriteLine(b.x);
    }
}
the output is 10. The assignment of a to b creates a copy of the value, and b is thus unaffected by the assignment to a.x. Had Point instead been declared as a class, the output would be 100 because a and b would reference the same object.

end example

16.4.3 Inheritance

All struct types implicitly inherit from the class System.ValueType, which, in turn, inherits from class object. A struct declaration may specify a list of implemented interfaces, but it is not possible for a struct declaration to specify a base class.

Struct types are never abstract and are always implicitly sealed. The abstract and sealed modifiers are therefore not permitted in a struct declaration.

Since inheritance isn’t supported for structs, the declared accessibility of a struct member cannot be protected, private protected, or protected internal.

Function members in a struct cannot be abstract or virtual, and the override modifier is allowed only to override methods inherited from System.ValueType.

16.4.4 Assignment

Assignment to a variable of a struct type creates a copy of the value being assigned. This differs from assignment to a variable of a class type, which copies the reference but not the object identified by the reference.

Similar to an assignment, when a struct is passed as a value parameter or returned as the result of a function member, a copy of the struct is created. A struct may be passed by reference to a function member using a by-reference parameter.

When a property or indexer of a struct is the target of an assignment, the instance expression associated with the property or indexer access shall be classified as a variable. If the instance expression is classified as a value, a compile-time error occurs. This is described in further detail in §12.21.2.

16.4.5 Default values

As described in §9.3, several kinds of variables are automatically initialized to their default value when they are created. For variables of class types and other reference types, this default value is null. However, since structs are value types that cannot be null, the default value of a struct is the value produced by setting all value type fields to their default value and all reference type fields to null.

Example: Referring to the Point struct declared above, the example
Point[] a = new Point[100];
initializes each Point in the array to the value produced by setting the x and y fields to zero.

end example

The default value of a struct corresponds to the value returned by the default constructor of the struct (§8.3.3). Unlike a class, a struct is not permitted to declare a parameterless instance constructor. Instead, every struct implicitly has a parameterless instance constructor, which always returns the value that results from setting all fields to their default values.

Note: Structs should be designed to consider the default initialization state a valid state. In the example
struct KeyValuePair
{
    string key;
    string value;

    public KeyValuePair(string key, string value)
    {
        if (key == null || value == null)
        {
            throw new ArgumentException();
        }

        this.key = key;
        this.value = value;
    }
}
the user-defined instance constructor protects against null values only where it is explicitly called. In cases where a KeyValuePair variable is subject to default value initialization, the key and value fields will be null, and the struct should be prepared to handle this state.

end note

16.4.6 Boxing and unboxing

A value of a class type can be converted to type object or to an interface type that is implemented by the class simply by treating the reference as another type at compile-time. Likewise, a value of type object or a value of an interface type can be converted back to a class type without changing the reference (but, of course, a run-time type check is required in this case).

Since structs are not reference types, these operations are implemented differently for struct types. When a value of a struct type is converted to certain reference types (as defined in §10.2.9), a boxing operation takes place. Likewise, when a value of certain reference types (as defined in §10.3.7) is converted back to a struct type, an unboxing operation takes place. A key difference from the same operations on class types is that boxing and unboxing copies the struct value either into or out of the boxed instance.

Note: Thus, following a boxing or unboxing operation, changes made to the unboxed struct are not reflected in the boxed struct. end note

For further details on boxing and unboxing, see §10.2.9 and §10.3.7.

16.4.7 Meaning of this

The meaning of this in a struct differs from the meaning of this in a class, as described in §12.8.14. When a struct type overrides a virtual method inherited from System.ValueType (such as Equals, GetHashCode, or ToString), invocation of the virtual method through an instance of the struct type does not cause boxing to occur. This is true even when the struct is used as a type parameter and the invocation occurs through an instance of the type parameter type.

Example:
struct Counter
{
    int value;
    public override string ToString() 
    {
        value++;
        return value.ToString();
    }
}

class Program
{
    static void Test<T>() where T : new()
    {
        T x = new T();
        Console.WriteLine(x.ToString());
        Console.WriteLine(x.ToString());
        Console.WriteLine(x.ToString());
    }

    static void Main() => Test<Counter>();
}
The output of the program is:
1
2
3
Although it is bad style for ToString to have side effects, the example demonstrates that no boxing occurred for the three invocations of x.ToString().

end example

Similarly, boxing never implicitly occurs when accessing a member on a constrained type parameter when the member is implemented within the value type. For example, suppose an interface ICounter contains a method Increment, which can be used to modify a value. If ICounter is used as a constraint, the implementation of the Increment method is called with a reference to the variable that Increment was called on, never a boxed copy.

Example:

interface ICounter
{
    void Increment();
}

struct Counter : ICounter
{
    int value;

    public override string ToString() => value.ToString();

    void ICounter.Increment() => value++;
}

class Program
{
    static void Test<T>() where T : ICounter, new()
    {
        T x = new T();
        Console.WriteLine(x);
        x.Increment();              // Modify x
        Console.WriteLine(x);
        ((ICounter)x).Increment();  // Modify boxed copy of x
        Console.WriteLine(x);
    }

    static void Main() => Test<Counter>();
}

The first call to Increment modifies the value in the variable x. This is not equivalent to the second call to Increment, which modifies the value in a boxed copy of x. Thus, the output of the program is:

0
1
1

end example

16.4.8 Field initializers

As described in §16.4.5, the default value of a struct consists of the value that results from setting all value type fields to their default value and all reference type fields to null. For this reason, a struct does not permit instance field declarations to include variable initializers. This restriction applies only to instance fields. Static fields of a struct are permitted to include variable initializers.

Example: The following
struct Point
{
    public int x = 1; // Error, initializer not permitted
    public int y = 1; // Error, initializer not permitted
}
is in error because the instance field declarations include variable initializers.

end example

16.4.9 Constructors

Unlike a class, a struct is not permitted to declare a parameterless instance constructor. Instead, every struct implicitly has a parameterless instance constructor, which always returns the value that results from setting all value type fields to their default value and all reference type fields to null (§8.3.3). A struct can declare instance constructors having parameters.

Example: Given the following
struct Point
{
    int x, y;

    public Point(int x, int y) 
    {
        this.x = x;
        this.y = y;
    }
}

class A
{
    static void Main()
    {
        Point p1 = new Point();
        Point p2 = new Point(0, 0);
    }
}
the statements both create a Point with x and y initialized to zero.

end example

A struct instance constructor is not permitted to include a constructor initializer of the form base(argument_list), where argument_list is optional.

The this parameter of a struct instance constructor corresponds to an output parameter of the struct type. As such, this shall be definitely assigned (§9.4) at every location where the constructor returns. Similarly, it cannot be read (even implicitly) in the constructor body before being definitely assigned.

If the struct instance constructor specifies a constructor initializer, that initializer is considered a definite assignment to this that occurs prior to the body of the constructor. Therefore, the body itself has no initialization requirements.

Example: Consider the instance constructor implementation below:
struct Point
{
    int x, y;

    public int X
    {
        set { x = value; }
    }

    public int Y 
    {
        set { y = value; }
    }

    public Point(int x, int y) 
    {
        X = x; // error, this is not yet definitely assigned
        Y = y; // error, this is not yet definitely assigned
    }
}
No instance function member (including the set accessors for the properties X and Y) can be called until all fields of the struct being constructed have been definitely assigned. Note, however, that if Point were a class instead of a struct, the instance constructor implementation would be permitted. There is one exception to this, and that involves automatically implemented properties (§15.7.4). The definite assignment rules (§12.21.2) specifically exempt assignment to an auto-property of a struct type within an instance constructor of that struct type: such an assignment is considered a definite assignment of the hidden backing field of the auto-property. Thus, the following is allowed:
struct Point
{
    public int X { get; set; }
    public int Y { get; set; }

    public Point(int x, int y)
    {
        X = x; // allowed, definitely assigns backing field
        Y = y; // allowed, definitely assigns backing field
   }
}
end example]

16.4.10 Static constructors

Static constructors for structs follow most of the same rules as for classes. The execution of a static constructor for a struct type is triggered by the first of the following events to occur within an application domain:

A static member of the struct type is referenced.
An explicitly declared constructor of the struct type is called.

Note: The creation of default values (§16.4.5) of struct types does not trigger the static constructor. (An example of this is the initial value of elements in an array.) end note

16.4.11 Automatically implemented properties

Automatically implemented properties (§15.7.4) use hidden backing fields, which are only accessible to the property accessors.

Note: This access restriction means that constructors in structs containing automatically implemented properties often need an explicit constructor initializer where they would not otherwise need one, to satisfy the requirement of all fields being definitely assigned before any function member is invoked or the constructor returns. end note

16.4.12 Safe context constraint

16.4.12.1 General

At compile-time, each expression is associated with a context where that instance and all its fields can be safely accessed, its safe-context. The safe-context is a context, enclosing an expression, which it is safe for the value to escape to.

Any expression whose compile-time type is not a ref struct has a safe-context of caller-context.

A default expression, for any type, has safe-context of caller-context.

For any non-default expression whose compile-time type is a ref struct has a safe-context defined by the following sections.

The safe-context records which context a value may be copied into. Given an assignment from an expression E1 with a safe-context S1, to an expression E2 with safe-context S2, it is an error if S2 is a wider context than S1.

There are three different safe-context values, the same as the ref-safe-context values defined for reference variables (§9.7.2): declaration-block, function-member, and caller-context. The safe-context of an expression constrains its use as follows:

For a return statement return e1, the safe-context of e1 shall be caller-context.
For an assignment e1 = e2 the safe-context of e2 shall be at least as wide a context as the safe-context of e1.

For a method invocation if there is a ref or out argument of a ref struct type (including the receiver unless the type is readonly), with safe-context S1, then no argument (including the receiver) may have a narrower safe-context than S1.

16.4.12.2 Parameter safe context

A parameter of a ref struct type, including the this parameter of an instance method, has a safe-context of caller-context.

16.4.12.3 Local variable safe context

A local variable of a ref struct type has a safe-context as follows:

If the variable is an iteration variable of a foreach loop, then the variable’s safe-context is the same as the safe-context of the foreach loop’s expression.
Otherwise if the variable’s declaration has an initializer then the variable’s safe-context is the same as the safe-context of that initializer.
Otherwise the variable is uninitialized at the point of declaration and has a safe-context of caller-context.

16.4.12.4 Field safe context

A reference to a field e.F, where the type of F is a ref struct type, has a safe-context that is the same as the safe-context of e.

16.4.12.5 Operators

The application of a user-defined operator is treated as a method invocation (§16.4.12.6).

For an operator that yields a value, such as e1 + e2 or c ? e1 : e2, the safe-context of the result is the narrowest context among the safe-contexts of the operands of the operator. As a consequence, for a unary operator that yields a value, such as +e, the safe-context of the result is the safe-context of the operand.

Note: The first operand of a conditional operator is a bool, so its safe-context is caller-context. It follows that the resulting safe-context is the narrowest safe-context of the second and third operand. end note

16.4.12.6 Method and property invocation

A value resulting from a method invocation e1.M(e2, ...) or property invocation e.P has safe-context of the smallest of the following contexts:

caller-context.
The safe-context of all argument expressions (including the receiver).

A property invocation (either get or set) is treated as a method invocation of the underlying method by the above rules.

16.4.12.7 stackalloc

The result of a stackalloc expression has safe-context of function-member.

16.4.12.8 Constructor invocations

A new expression that invokes a constructor obeys the same rules as a method invocation that is considered to return the type being constructed.

In addition the safe-context is the smallest of the safe-contexts of all arguments and operands of all object initializer expressions, recursively, if any initializer is present.

Note: These rules rely on Span<T> not having a constructor of the following form:
public Span<T>(ref T p)
Such a constructor makes instances of Span<T> used as fields indistinguishable from a ref field. The safety rules described in this document depend on ref fields not being a valid construct in C# or .NET. end note

Megosztás a következőn keresztül: