Req13: Catches in Using blocks
[This post is part of a series, "wish-list for future versions of VB"]
IDEA: Allow Catch statements in Using blocks. A Using block is just a Try/Finally block that calls "Dispose" in its destructor. It'd be handy if you could stick "Catch" statements inside the Using block as well. In other words, this code
Using x As New C
....
Catch ex As System.IO.FileFormatException
....
End Using
would be shorthand for this:
Dim x As New C
Try
....
Catch ex As System.IO.FileFormatException
....
Finally
If x IsNot Nothing Then
x.Dispose()
End If
End Try
Provisional evaluation from VB team: it's a decent idea, one worth considering against the other desirable features. What do you think? Does it provide enough benefit to be worth adding to the language?
Anonymous
February 15, 2010
Should it be shorthand for Dim f = IO.File.Open(...) Try ... Catch ex As IO.IOException ... Finally If f IsNot Nothing Then DirectCast(f, IDisposable).Dispose End Try or Dim f As IO.FileStream Try f = IO.File.Open(...) ... Catch ex As IO.IOException ... Finally If f IsNot Nothing Then DirectCast(f, IDisposable).Dispose End Try ? This is important difference and I vote for the second version because now catchingexceptions in Using "header" is very difficult and leads to ugly code (whole Using enclosed io Try-Catch).Anonymous
February 15, 2010
If it isn't hard, please do this. I find myself using that pattern a lot.Anonymous
February 15, 2010
+1 from me.. I would love to see this feature.Anonymous
February 15, 2010
Definitely a ‘nice to have’ feature – it’s quite a common use case.Anonymous
February 15, 2010
Yup. It's simple, logical, and reduces indentation (especially if you have multiple nested usings, and you currently are nesting those within Try/Catch blocks.Anonymous
February 16, 2010
Back in the days when C# has "using" but VB didn't, I had hoped for this Try Using d As New DisposableObject ... Catch ex As Exception '// Optional ... Finally '// Optional ... End Try To me the syntax properly indicate that the operation could fail, and if it does, we have the option to catch the exception and/or do any cleanup. The beauty of it (to me at least :-)) is we are reusing the common Try...End Try construct. Now I would consider a "Use" keyword ala F# Sub MethodA Use d1 As New DisposableObject ... Try Use d2 As New DisposableObject ... Catch ex As Exception ... Finally ... End Try '// d2 is disposed here End Sub '// d1 is disposed hereAnonymous
February 16, 2010
Oh.. I failed to mention both Use and Using can coexist. Given a choice between Using/Catch and Use, I'd prefer Use, as I see Using block more of a resource management construct than an error handling construct. Mixing Using/Catch and Try/Catch in the same method body probably isn't a good idea (Try Using/Catch would be a different story though :-))Anonymous
March 13, 2010
While I don't think I'd use it all over the place, this would be a handy feature to have for those occasions when I did use it.Anonymous
April 03, 2011
A small advantage C# has over VB with using/Using is the ability to nest multiple usings without using extra braces: using x using y using z { // ... } Could we perhaps have an equivalent in VB? It could look like this: Using x, y, z ' ... End Using Each "argument" would be in scope for the declaration/initialization of the next, just like with nested Usings today. The advantage would be that we could avoid three-layers deep indentation when performing a simple SQL query, for instance.Anonymous
April 03, 2011
Hey Jeff, the syntax you ask for is ALREADY in VB! Like this: Dim request = HttpWebRequest.Create("http://microsoft.com") Using response = request.GetResponse(), stream = response.GetResponseStream(), reader = New StreamReader(stream) Console.WriteLine(reader.ReadToEnd) End Using